JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clausen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Fabricius, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clausen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Fabricius, I.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Clausen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Fabricius, I.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Water Pollution
Right arrow Ground Water Quality

Atrazine, Isoproturon, Mecoprop, 2,4-D, and Bentazone Adsorption onto Iron Oxides

Liselotte Clausen and Ida Fabricius

Department of Geology and Geotechnical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Building 204, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark



View larger version (89K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) images of iron oxides. (A) Two-line ferrihydrite, (B) goethite, and (C) lepidocrocite. The scale bar in the SEM images is 200 nm (Clausen and Fabricius, 2000).

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. X-ray (CoK{alpha}) diffractograms of synthesized iron oxides. Fresh denotes that the measurements were performed on freshly precipitated material, and aged denotes that the measurements were performed on the same material after storage in suspension for more than 1 yr. G denotes goethite, L denotes lepidocrocite.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Structural formulae of herbicides used in sorption studies.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Langmuir adsorption isotherms shown on a linear scale for the sorption of 2,4-D, mecoprop, and bentazone on iron oxides. The corresponding Langmuir parameters are listed in Table 3. Error bars indicate standard deviation (may be covered by the symbols).

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Linear adsorption isotherms shown on a log scale for the sorption of 2,4-D, mecoprop, and bentazone on iron oxides, and adsorption distribution coefficients (Kd values) obtained from screening experiments with an initial pesticide concentration of 250 µg/L (1.04–1.21 µmol/L). Error bars indicate standard deviation (may be covered by the symbols).

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Adsorption distribution coefficients (Kd values) obtained at an initial pesticide concentration of 250 µg/L (1.04–1.21 µmol/L) for 2,4-D, mecoprop, and bentazone on iron oxides as a function of pH in solution. Error bars indicate standard deviation (may be covered by the symbols).

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Adsorption distribution coefficients (Kd values) obtained at an initial pesticide concentration of 250 µg/L (1.04–1.21 µmol/L) for 2,4-D, mecoprop, and bentazone on iron oxides as a function of the CaCl2 concentration. The solution conditions are: temperature = 10°C and pH 4.6 ± 0.1. Error bars indicate standard deviation (may be covered by the symbols).

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.