JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schulz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Reinecke, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schulz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Reinecke, A. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schulz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Reinecke, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Water Pollution

Spray Deposition of Two Insecticides into Surface Waters in a South African Orchard Area

Ralf Schulza, Sue K.C. Peallb, James M. Dabrowskia and Adriaan J. Reineckea

a Dep. of Zoology, Private Bag X1, Univ. of Stellenbosch, Matieland 7602, South Africa
b Forensic Chemistry Lab., Dep. of Health, Cape Town 8000, South Africa



View larger version (49K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Location of sampling sites (left): LR, sampling site in the Lourens River; END, site for the endosulfan trials; AZI, site for the azinphos-methyl trials. Plot schematic (right) depicting the orientation of spray deposit collectors and sampling sites for tributary water samples during the azinphos-methyl trials with a 10-m distance between tree row and tributary.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Spray deposition (±SE) of azinphos-methyl at different distances downwind of the orchard tree row (bearing pears). Squared regression coefficient for an exponential regression is R2 = 0.99.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Spray deposition rates of azinphos-methyl measured in the present study and 95th-percentile values for basic drift deposition according either to the German exposure assessment procedure (Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry; BBA) (Ganzelmeier et al., 1995) using late growth stage or to the U.S. Spray Drift Task Force (SDTF) data set (USEPA, 1999) using high drift potential orchards.

 


View larger version (45K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Concentrations (±SE) of endosulfan in tributary water 15 m downwind of the sprayed plot. A, calculated peak concentrations based on 95th-percentile values for basic drift deposition (Ganzelmeier et al., 1995); B1, calculated peak value based on measured deposition rate; B2, measured peak value; C, measured 1-h average value.

 


View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Concentrations (±SE) of azinphos-methyl in tributary water 10 m downwind of the sprayed plot. A, calculated peak concentrations based on 95th-percentile values for basic drift deposition (Ganzelmeier et al., 1995); B1, calculated peak value based on measured deposition rate; B2, measured peak value; C, measured 1-h average value.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.