JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gallivan, G.J.
Right arrow Articles by Kovach, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gallivan, G.J.
Right arrow Articles by Kovach, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gallivan, G.J.
Right arrow Articles by Kovach, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Ecological Risk Assessment
Right arrow Other Models

Pesticide Risk Reduction on Crops in the Province of Ontario

G.J. Gallivana, G.A. Surgeonera and J. Kovachb

a Dep. of Environmental Biology, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
b IPM Program, Selby Hall, Ohio State Univ., Wooster, Ohio, 44691



View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Formula for calculating the Environmental Impact Quotient (EIQ) for individual pesticides (Kovach et al., 1992). The solid box is the Farmworker component, the dotted box is the Consumer component, and the dashed box is the Ecological component.

 


View larger version (45K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Pesticide use (kg x 106 of active ingredient) on agricultural crops in the Province of Ontario from 1973 to 1998. Pesticide use on fruits in 1973 includes both fruits and vegetables.

 


View larger version (53K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Area (ha x 106) of agricultural crops in the Province of Ontario from 1973 to 1998.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Mean application rate (kg ha-1) of pesticides on the agricultural crops with the highest pesticide use in the Province of Ontario from 1973 to 1998.

 


View larger version (41K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Amount (kg x 106) of each type of pesticide used on agricultural crops in the Province of Ontario from 1973 to 1998.

 


View larger version (46K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Environmental Impact (EI x 106) of agricultural crops in the Province of Ontario from 1973 to 1998. The EI on fruits in 1973 includes both fruits and vegetables, and was estimated using the average Environmental Impact Quotient (EIQ) for the pesticide types as described in the Methods section.

 


View larger version (49K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Mean Environmental Impact Quotient (EIQ), or EI per kilogram of pesticide, for the agricultural crops with the highest pesticide use in the Province of Ontario from 1973 to 1998.

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Pesticide use (kg) per tonne of yield for the agricultural crops with the highest pesticide use in the Province of Ontario from 1973 to 1998.

 


View larger version (18K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Yield (tonnes ha-1) versus the mean application rate (kg ha-1) for pesticides on agricultural crops in the Province of Ontario from 1973 to 1998.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10. Pesticide use (kg) per Canadian dollar of crop value for agricultural crops in the Province of Ontario from 1973 to 1998. Crop values (Canadian dollars) were adjusted to 1983 dollars.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.