JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ausma, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mortimer, W. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ausma, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mortimer, W. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ausma, S.
Right arrow Articles by Mortimer, W. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Air Pollution
Right arrow Soil Pollution

A Micrometeorological Technique to Monitor Total Hydrocarbon Emissions from Landfarms to the Atmosphere

Sandra Ausmaa, Grant C. Edwardsb, Edwina K. Wongb, Terry J. Gillespiea, Colleen R. Fitzgerald-Hubbleb, Laurie Halfpenny-Mitchellb and Wendy P. Mortimerc

a Dep. of Land Resource Science, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
b School of Engineering, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
c Bell Canada, 250 Fieldway Rd., Toronto, ON, Canada M8Z 3L2



View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic of system developed to measure total hydrocarbon (THC) fluxes from petroleum-contaminated soils. (A) THC gradient ({partial}C) measurement equipment and instrumentation. (B) Micrometeorological instrumentation to determine eddy diffusivity (K). (C) Data acquisition and control system to integrate gradient measurement with micrometeorological measurements. (D) Supplemental data acquisition using data-loggers.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Ideal and actual total hydrocarbon detector (THD) response upon switching of solenoid between upper and lower intakes.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Total hydrocarbon fluxes over a diesel fuel–contaminated soil landfarm. Measurements made between 15 and 23 June 1996. Landfarm construction was completed on DOY 167. Tilling was performed in the afternoon of DOY 167 and the morning of DOY 171.

 


View larger version (20K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Total hydrocarbon fluxes over a refinery landfarm measured between 15 and 18 Sept. 1997. Liquid oily waste was spread between 1330 and 1400 on DOY 259. Dewatered biosolids were spread between 1500 and 1530 on DOY 261.

 


View larger version (22K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Total hydrocarbon fluxes over an active refinery landfarm. Data collected between 29 Oct. and 3 Nov. 1999. Dashed rectangles mark periods of intensive subsurface injection of oily liquid wastes and cultivation.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.