JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Related articles in JEQ
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maguire, R.O.
Right arrow Articles by Mah, J.T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maguire, R.O.
Right arrow Articles by Mah, J.T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Maguire, R.O.
Right arrow Articles by Mah, J.T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Municipal Waste
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Nutrient Management

Relationships between Biosolids Treatment Process and Soil Phosphorus Availability

R.O. Maguirea, J.T. Simsa, S.K. Dentelb, F.J. Coalec and J.T. Mahb

a Dep. Plant and Soil Science, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19717-1303
b Dep. Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Delaware, Newark, DE 19717-1303
c Dep. Natural Resource Science and Landscape Architecture, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-5821



View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The influence of biosolids type on water-soluble phosphorus concentrations in the (a) Elkton and (b) Suffolk soils during the 51-d incubation study. Data are for Biosolids 1, 2, 4, and 6 (B1, B2, B4, B6). Note differences in scale for the y axis.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The influence of biosolids type on iron-oxide strip–extractable phosphorus (FeO-P) concentrations in the (a) Elkton and (b) Suffolk soils during the 51-d incubation study. Data are for Biosolids 1, 2, 4, and 6 (B1, B2, B4, B6).

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Relationship between (a) Mehlich-3 phosphorus in biosolids and (b) the molar ratio of USEPA 3050 phosphorus to [Al + Fe] in biosolids and the changes in water-soluble phosphorus (WSP), normalized per 100 kg P/ha added, in the Elkton and Suffolk soils during the incubation study.

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Relationship between (a) Mehlich-3 phosphorus in biosolids and (b) the molar ratio of USEPA 3050 phosphorus to [Al + Fe] in biosolids and the changes in iron-oxide strip–extractable phosphorus (FeO-P), normalized per 100 kg P/ha added, in the Elkton and Suffolk soils during the incubation study.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Relationship between (a) Mehlich-3 phosphorus in biosolids and (b) the molar ratio of USEPA 3050 phosphorus to [Al + Fe] in biosolids and the changes in Mehlich-1 phosphorus, normalized per 100 kg P/ha added, in the Elkton silt loam and Suffolk sandy loam soils during the incubation study.

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.