JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaynor, J.D.
Right arrow Articles by van Wesenbeeck, I.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaynor, J.D.
Right arrow Articles by van Wesenbeeck, I.J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gaynor, J.D.
Right arrow Articles by van Wesenbeeck, I.J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Surface Water Quality

Tillage, Intercrop, and Controlled Drainage–Subirrigation Influence Atrazine, Metribuzin, and Metolachlor Loss

J.D. Gaynora, C.S. Tana, C.F. Drurya, H.Y.F. Nga,b, T.W. Welackya and I.J. van Wesenbeeckc

a Crops Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Harrow, ON N0R 1G0
b NWRI Environment Canada, Burlington, ON L7R 4A6
c Dow AgroSciences, Environmental Fate, Bldg 306-Az, 9330 Zionsville Rd., Indianapolis, IN 46268



View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Monthly (bars) and 10-yr average (solid line) rainfall from January 1992 to May 1995 at Woodslee, ON, Canada. Arrows denote time of herbicide application

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Runoff and herbicide concentration in the runoff from May 1992 to April 1995 with either drainage (D) or controlled drainage–subirrigation (CDS). Arrows denote time of herbicide application. Vertical bars are standard error of treatment means (n = 8). Dashed lines are Canadian interim maximum acceptable concentration (triazine = 5 µg L-1 and metolachlor = 50 µg L-1)

 


View larger version (32K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Tile drainage and herbicide concentration in the drainage from May 1992 to April 1995 with either drainage (D) or controlled drainage–subirrigation (CDS). Arrows denote time of herbicide application. Vertical bars are standard error of treatment means (n = 8). Dashed lines are Canadian interim maximum acceptable concentration (triazine = 5 µg L-1 and metolachlor = 50 µg L-1)

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Cumulative surface runoff and herbicide loss in the runoff from May 1992 to April 1995 with either drainage (D) or controlled drainage–subirrigation (CDS). Arrows denote time of herbicide application. Vertical bars are standard error of treatment means (n = 8)

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Cumulative tile drainage and herbicide loss in the drainage from May 1992 to April 1995 with either drainage (D) or controlled drainage–subirrigation (CDS). Arrows denote time of herbicide application. Vertical bars are standard error of treatment means (n = 8)

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.