JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Troiano, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bartkowiak, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Troiano, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bartkowiak, D.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Troiano, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bartkowiak, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ground Water Quality
Right arrow Agricultural Pesticides
Right arrow Water Pollution

Summary of Well Water Sampling in California to Detect Pesticide Residues Resulting from Nonpoint-Source Applications

John Troiano, Don Weaver, Joe Marade, Frank Spurlock, Mark Pepple, Craig Nordmark and Donna Bartkowiak

Environmental Monitoring and Pest Management Branch, Dep. of Pesticide Regulation, California EPA, 830 K Street Mall, Sacramento, CA 95814-3510



View larger version (79K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Sections with pesticide detections in wells sampled in Fresno and Tulare Counties, excluding 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP), in (A) 1988, (B) 1990, (C) 1992, and (D) 1995

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Concentrations of aldicarb sulfoxide and aldicarb sulfone (minimum detection limit [MDL] at 0.1–0.4 µg L-1) in a well sampled in northwestern California after aldicarb use was suspended in 1984

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Concentration of 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) (minimum detection limit [MDL] at 0.01 µg L-1) in wells sampled in three different townships, in (A) T/R/S-14S22E23, (B) T/R/S-13S21E16, and (C) T/R/S-15S23E26. Wells were sampled after agricultural use was suspended in 1979

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Comparison of the frequency distributions for concentrations of preemergence herbicide residues detected in California well water samples and attributed to nonpoint-source applications. (A) Simazine compared with bromacil and diuron; (B) simazine + 2-amino-4-chloro-6-ethylamino-s-triazine (ACET) + 2,4-diamino-6-chloro-s-triazine (DACT) compared with bromacil and diuron. Detection above minimum detection limits [MDLs], which range from 0.05 to 0.1 µg L-1

 


View larger version (83K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Areas where pesticide residues have been detected in California and their presence has been determined to result from nonpoint-source applications

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.