JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M.M.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, K.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M.M.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, K.R.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fisher, M.M.
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, K.R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Wetland Soils
Right arrow Wetlands and Aquatic Processes
Right arrow Nutrient Management

Phosphorus Flux from Wetland Soils Affected by Long-Term Nutrient Loading

M.M. Fisher and K.R. Reddy

Wetland Biogeochemistry Lab., Soil and Water Science Dep., Univ. of Florida, 106 Newell Hall, P.O. Box 110510, Gainesville, FL 32611



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Location of study site and experimental locations. Porewater equilibrators were installed and intact soil cores were taken at Stations 1 through 8. Benthic flux chambers were used at Stations 1, 3, and 8. Field-dried soil cores were taken at Stations F1, F4, and U3

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Flowchart depicting the sequence of intact soil core experiments in the greenhouse and the field studies

 


View larger version (36K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Phosphorus flux observed in intact soils cores from WCA-2A under aerobic and anaerobic water column conditions (n = 3). Error bars represent one standard deviation. Time for Experiments I, II, and III: 0 to 10, 10 to 20, and 20 to 56 d, respectively. Note different axis scaling in panels (c) and (d)

 


View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Dissolved oxygen, nitrate, and sulfate consumption rates as a function of distance from the nutrient inflow in WCA-2A as measured during Experiment II. Error bars represent one standard deviation

 


View larger version (14K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Soil oxygen demand measured on surface soils collected at WCA-2A

 


View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Ambient diel changes in pH, dissolved O2, and temperature at Stations 1, 3, and 8 on 16 July 1996 in WCA-2A

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Stoichiometric relationship between oxygen consumption and P mineralization. Data are from intact cores collected from Stations 1 through 4 along the WCA-2A nutrient gradient

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Average soluble phosphorus flux from soil to the overlying water column. Error bars represent standard error

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.