JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Muir, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Muir, J. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sanderson, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Muir, J. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling
Right arrow Animal Waste
Right arrow Ground Water Quality

Nutrient Movement and Removal in a Switchgrass Biomass–Filter Strip System Treated with Dairy Manure

Matt A. Sandersona, Ronald M. Jonesb, Marshall J. McFarlandb, Jason Stroupb, Roderick L. Reedb and James P. Muirb

a USDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, Bldg. 3702, Curtin Rd., University Park, PA 16802-3702
b Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX 76909



View larger version (24K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Schematic of field plot design and arrangement. Not to scale. O, no manure; L, low manure rate; M, medium rate; H, high rate; VH, very high rate of manure. Surface runoff was sampled only from plots O, M, and VH in each block. Soil water samplers were installed in each plot

 


View larger version (25K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Dry matter (DM) yields during 1995 to 1997 as a function of manure N application rate. Data are means of four replicates. RMSE, root mean square error

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Changes in extractable P (using the Texas A&M extractant) in the surface 15 cm of soil as a function of manure rate and time. Data are means of four replicates. Standard error bars represent the pooled standard error from the analysis of variance and apply to all treatments within a date

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Concentrations of total reactive P in surface runoff water from the manure-treated areas and vegetative filter strips. Effluent was applied on 16 Apr., 1 May, 20 May, and 25 June 1996 (Days 106, 121, 140, and 176; not shown on figure). Arrows indicate dates of effluent application in 1997. Data are means of four replicates plus one standard error

 


View larger version (21K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Concentrations of chemical oxygen demand (COD) in surface runoff water from the manure-treated areas and a vegetative filter strip. Data are means of four replicates. Error bars (representing the pooled SE from the analysis of variance) above the solid column apply to data from the manured area. Error bars above the open column apply to data from the filter strip area

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.