JEQ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shirazi, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shirazi, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, C. B.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shirazi, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, C. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Soil Models

Spatial Extrapolation of Soil Characteristics Using Whole-Soil Particle Size Distributions

Mostafa A. Shirazia, Larry Boersmab, Patricia K. Haggertyb and Colleen Burch Johnsonb

a Western Ecology Division, NHEERL, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 200 S.W. 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333
b OAO Corporation, 200 S.W. 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333



View larger version (38K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. A schematic presentation of data aggregation and relationships with soil characteristic (SC) models. Soil loss tolerance factor, erodibility, the high and low ranges of seven soil SCs are aggregated from layers (top left box) to a pedon, plus the high and low ranges of three SCs are aggregated again from pedons (top right box) to a map unit SC. Models defined by the equations for conditional expectations are produced separately for each SCq in each USDA5 texture class using the odd-numbered map units (lower left boxes). Each SC model is tested two ways: an interpolation test (not shown here) verifies the assumption of grouping by the whole-soil particle size distribution (PSD) statistics (dg and {sigma}g) and an extrapolation test (arrow from lower right box) predicts the SCq of the even-numbered map unit groups (MUGs)

 


View larger version (29K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. The USDA5 texture trajectory system showing 30 map unit groups (MUGs) and number of map units, shaded circles (A), the high and low ranges of soil available water capacity (B), and cation exchange capacity (C) in shaded triangles. cr = coarse-textured soils, fn = fine-textured soils, mecr = medium coarse-textured soils, mocr = moderately coarse-textured soils, mofn = moderately fine-textured soils

 





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.