HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vogel, J. R. Articles by Oerther, D. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vogel, J. R. Articles by Oerther, D. B. Agricola Articles by Vogel, J. R. Articles by Oerther, D. B. Related Collections Water Quality Other Environmental Contamination Water Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Surface Water Quality

Identifying Fecal Sources in a Selected Catchment Reach Using Multiple Source-Tracking Tools

^a USGS, 5231 S. 19th St., Lincoln, NE 68512
^b USGS, 6480 Doubletree Ave., Columbus, OH 43229
^c Dep. of Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45220
^d USEPA Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Lab., 26 Martin Luther King Dr., MS-387, Cincinnati, OH 45268
^e Nebraska Dep. of Environmental Quality, 1200 "N" St., Suite 400, P.O. Box 98922, Lincoln, NE 68509

^* Corresponding author (jrvogel{at}usgs.gov)

Received for publication June 27, 2006. Given known limitations of current microbial source-tracking (MST) tools, emphasis on small, simple study areas may enhance interpretations of fecal contamination sources in streams. In this study, three MST tools—Escherichia coli repetitive element polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR), coliphage typing, and Bacteroidales 16S rDNA host-associated markers—were evaluated in a selected reach of Plum Creek in south-central Nebraska. Water-quality samples were collected from six sites. One reach was selected for MST evaluation based on observed patterns of E. coli contamination. Despite high E. coli concentrations, coliphages were detected only once among water samples, precluding their use as a MST tool in this setting. Rep-PCR classification of E. coli isolates from both water and sediment samples supported the hypothesis that cattle and wildlife were dominant sources of fecal contamination, with minor contributions by horses and humans. Conversely, neither ruminant nor human sources were detected by Bacteroidales markers in most water samples. In bed sediment, ruminant- and human-associated Bacteroidales markers were detected throughout the interval from 0 to 0.3 m, with detections independent of E. coli concentrations in the sediment. Although results by E. coli-based and Bacteroidales-based MST methods led to similar interpretations, detection of Bacteroidales markers in sediment more commonly than in water indicates that different tools to track fecal contamination (in this case, tools based on Bacteroidales DNA and E. coli isolates) may have varying relevance to the more specific goal of tracking the sources of E. coli in watersheds. This is the first report of simultaneous, toolbox approach application of a library-based and marker-based MST analyses to flowing surface water.

Abbreviations: MST, microbial source tracking • PCR, polymerase chain reaction • Rep-PCR, repetitive element PCR • BMP, best management practice • TMDL, total maximum daily load • CFU, colony forming unit • DO, dissolved oxygen • OWML, Ohio Water Science Center Microbiology Lab. • OTU, operational taxonomic unit

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. L. Hansen, S. Ishii, M. J. Sadowsky, and R. E. Hicks Escherichia coli Populations in Great Lakes Waterfowl Exhibit Spatial Stability and Temporal Shifting Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 15, 2009; 75(6): 1546 - 1551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]