JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 9:610-615 (1980)
© 1980 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olszyk, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hertzberg, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Olszyk, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hertzberg, W. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Olszyk, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hertzberg, W. M.

Environment in Open-top Field Chambers Utilized for Air Pollution Studies1

D. M. Olszyk, T. W. Tibbitts and W. M. Hertzberg2

ABSTRACT

Cylindrical open-top chambers were established in an alfalfa field (Medicago sativa L.) 50 km north of Madison, Wis. Chambers were set up with and without activated charcoal filters. Environmental measurements were made at different times during the summer growing season. The environment of open-top chambers was found to differ somewhat from open areas. Light intensity was as much as 20% lower, temperature increases as great as 2°C were measured, and evaporative water loss was 10% less in the chambers than open areas. The filtered and nonfiltered chambers had slightly different environments as a result of variations in air flow rates and dust accumulation in the plenums of the two types of chambers. Across the chambers, there was a gradient in light intensity and evaporative water loss, but no significant gradient in temperature or air velocity. There was no evidence of pollution injury to alfalfa in this study.

The environmental changes in chambers were shown to cause differences in plant growth which likely caused changes in pollution sensitivity of plants within the chambers. However, it is postulated that this altered plant growth would likely not result in either a consistent increase or decrease in sensitivity at different times during the growing season or in different years. Thus, when open-top chambers are utilized for the determination of crop yield losses, assessments should be based on studies conducted over several different growing periods.

Key Words: alfalfa • ozone


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Horticulture Dep. and Inst. for Environ. Studies, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706. This project has been financed in part by federal funds from the EPA under grant no. R803971, by the Wisconsin Public Service Corp., Madison Gas and Electric Co., Wisconsin Power and Light Co., and by the College of Agric. and Life Sci., Univ. of Wisconsin. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the EPA, Dep. of Horticulture, Univ. of Wisconsin, or the above corporations, nor does mention of a trade name for a commercial product constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

2 Environmental Analyst, Public Service Commission of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.; Professor, Dep. of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.; and Specialist, Dep. of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.; respectively.

Received for publication December 26, 1979.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.