JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 9:187-190 (1980)
© 1980 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zartman, R. E
Right arrow Articles by Gichuru, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zartman, R. E
Right arrow Articles by Gichuru, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zartman, R. E
Right arrow Articles by Gichuru, M.

Effects of Water Quality on Forage Production1

R. E Zartman, T. D. Miller, J. R. Goodin and M. Gichuru2

ABSTRACT

Field studies were conducted during a 4-year period to determine the influence of water quality on forage production. Three levels of blow down water (used to cool the electrical generating facility) (EC = 12 mmhos/cm, SAR = 11) and city water (EC = 1.5 mmhos/cm, SAR = 4.3) were used to irrigate alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and fourwinged saltbush [Atriplex canescens (Pursh.) Nutt.]. Forage stands were initiated in 1975 on a Friona fine sandy loam which is a fine-loamy, mixed, thermic, Petrocalcic Paleustoll. Alfalfa yields responded positively to irrigation. The highest yield occurred in the high-irrigation city water treatment followed by the high-irrigation blow down water treatment. The medium-irrigation levels produced intermediate yields, with the dryland production decreasing during the span of the experiment. Atriplex yields were not significantly affected by irrigation. There was no difference in forage production with respect to irrigation with either city or blow down water.

The results of this experiment indicate that both alfalfa and Atriplex can utilize blow down water as an irrigation water source. From a forage management perspective, however, there is a difference between the crops. Alfalfa responds to water additions with increased forage production, whereas Atriplex does not under these conditions.

Key Words: blow down water • irrigation • alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) • fourwinged saltbush [Atriplex canescens (Pursh.) Nutt.] • basin irrigation • electrical conductivity (EC) • sodium adsorption ratio (SAR


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Plant and Soil Science and the Dep. of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409.

2 Assistant Professor; former Graduate Research Assistant, now Area Agronomist, Weslaco, Tex.; Associate Professor; and Graduate Research Assistant, respectively.

Received for publication April 25, 1979.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.