JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 9:167-172 (1980)
© 1980 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patten, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Douglass, L. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Patten, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Douglass, L. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Patten, D. K.
Right arrow Articles by Douglass, L. W.

Effect of Antibiotics in Beef Cattle Feces on Nitrogen and Carbon Mineralization in Soil and on Plant Growth and Composition1

D. K. Patten, D. C. Wolf, W. E. Kunkle and L. W. Douglass2

ABSTRACT

The potential human health hazard associated with the use of antibiotics in animal feeds is currently being reevaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This study was conducted to investigate the impact of the addition of antibiotic-containing feces on soil biological activity. A total of nine beef cattle were placed on either a control feed, or a feed supplemented with chlortetracycline (CTC) or oxytetracycline (OTC) for a period of 10 days. Feces from these cattle were collected and analyzed for chemical, physical, and microbiological properties. Samples of the feces were added to an Evesboro sandy loam at rates equivalent to 0, 9.4, and 18.8 dry metric tons/ha (0, 20, and 40 wet tons [U.S.]/acre). Carbon and nitrogen mineralization were studied in the soil-feces system. Analyses of the feces indicated antibiotic-related changes in several properties. Total nitrogen in the feces of cattle receiving OTC was, at 1.50%, significantly lower than the 1.74% level found in the feces of CTC fed cattle. Feces from cattle receiving OTC contained a higher concentration of potassium, more fungi, and fewer volatile solids than did wastes from control animals. Antibiotics in the feed had no effect on number of total bacteria, total and fecal coliforms, or fecal streptococci; concentration of NH4-N, NO3-N, P, Ca, Mg, Na, Zn, Mn, Fe, or Cu; pH; percent moisture; or chemical oxygen demand in the feces. The antibiotics CTC and OTC were found at levels of 5.3 and 11.3 µg/g, respectively, in the feces of cattle receiving the antibiotics. When added to the soil, feces from antibiotic-fed cattle evolved approximately 20% more carbon than did control feces during a 70-day period. Nitrogen immobilization occurred for 28 days following feces addition to the soil. No significant differences due to the use of feces from antibiotic-fed cattle were observed in the rate of nitrogen mineralization in the soil during a 60-day incubation. Greenhouse experiments using feces from antibiotic-fed cattle as a soil amendment demonstrated no changes related to the antibiotics in the growth, yield, or elemental composition of 30-day-old corn seedlings (Zea mays L.).

Key Words: chlortetracycline • oxytetracycline • aureomycin • terramycin • manure


NOTES

1 Scientific Article no. A-2522 and Contribution no. 5554 of the Maryland Agric. Exp. Stn., Dep. of Agronomy, College Park, MD 20742.

2 Research Assistant, Associate Professor of Soil Science, Assistant Professor of Animal Science, and Associate Professor of Dairy Science, respectively.

Received for publication October 13, 1978.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1980 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.