JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 8:602-607 (1979)
© 1979 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Laflen, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Laflen, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Baker, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Laflen, J. M.

Runoff Losses of Surface-Applied Herbicides as Affected by Wheel Tracks and Incorporation1

J. L. Baker and J. M. Laflen2

ABSTRACT

The effects of incorporation and wheel-track compaction on runoff losses of herbicides were determined by measuring losses of propachlor (2-chloro-N-isopropylacetanilide), atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine], and alachlor [2-chloro-2',6'-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl) acetanilide] in water and sediment from small plots during 122 mm of simulated rainfall. Losses of propachlor, atrazine, and alachlor that were surface-applied to plots without wheel tracks were 3.0, 4.7, and 8.0%, respectively. Corresponding losses from plots where the herbicides were incorporated by disking were only 0.8, 1.6, and 1.7%. Hydrologic differences (more and sooner runoff) caused by wheel tracks on plots where herbicides were surface-applied increased the corresponding losses to 12.7, 18.3, and 22.1%. Although herbicide concentrations were greater in sediment than in water for all treatments, from 82 to 89% of the losses were in solution.

Key Words: best management practice • propachlor • atrazine • alachlor


NOTES

1 Journal Paper no. J-9367 of the Iowa Agric. and Home Econ. Exp. Stn., Ames, IA 50011. Project 2139.

2 Associate Professor, Agricultural Engineering, Iowa State Univ., and Agricultural Engineer, USDA-SEA-AR, respectively, Ames, Iowa.

Received for publication January 22, 1979.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
I.J. van Wesenbeeck, A.L. Peacock, and P.L. Havens
Measurement and Modeling of Diclosulam Runoff under the Influence of Simulated Severe Rainfall
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2001; 30(2): 553 - 560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1979 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.