JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 8:301-304 (1979)
© 1979 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hunt, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, C. R.

Reliability Problems With Indicator Organisms for Monitoring Overland Flow Treated Waste Water Effluent1

P. G. Hunt, R. E. Peters, T. C. Sturgis and C. R. Lee2

ABSTRACT

A 2-year study (1975–1976) on the response of indicator organisms in facultative lagoon waste water treated by overland flow was conducted in Utica, Mississippi. Overland flow plots of 4.55 by 45.5 m on 2% slope were established on a Grenada silty clay loam with an artificially established hard pan at 15 cm. The vegetation was a grass mixture dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.). Undisinfected waste water from a facultative lagoon was applied to the plots at a rate of 1.25 cm in 6 hours on 5 days a week. Fecal streptococci and fecal coliforms were enumerated in the waste water before it was applied to the plots, as it flowed down slope, and as it was discharged from the plots. Fecal streptococci were found to be poor indicators of the sanitary condition of effluent after overland flow treatment of waste water. Their numbers were consistently higher in the discharged effluent than in the waste water, even when only tap water was applied to the treatment plots. Fecal coliforms were questionable indicators of sanitary conditions in the discharged effluent during the summer when fecal coliform numbers were considerably higher in the discharged treated effluent than in the waste water coming directly from the lagoon. The extent of actual pathogen removal or growth on the soil surface during overland flow treatment was not assessed during this study. However, the use of fecal streptococci or fecal coliforms as indicators of pathogen removal by overland flow during the summer is seriously questioned. Disinfection after treatment by overland flow, at least during the summer, is suggested.

Key Words: fecal coliform • fecal streptococci • disinfection • growth • seasonal effect


NOTES

1 Contribution from the USDA-SEA-AR and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

2 Soil Scientist, AR, Florence, SC 29502; Research Agricultural Engineer, Biologist, and Research Soil Scientist, respectively, Environ. Lab., U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Exp. Stn., Vicksburg, MS 39180.

Received for publication November 4, 1978.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1979 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.