JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 8:162-166 (1979)
© 1979 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Keuren, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chichester, F. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Van Keuren, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chichester, F. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Van Keuren, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chichester, F. W.

Hydrology and Chemical Quality of Flow from Small Pastured Watersheds: I. Hydrology1

R. W. Van Keuren, J. L. Mc Guinness and F. W. Chichester2

ABSTRACT

Surface runoff, soil loss, and subsurface flow were measured from four rotationally grazed summer pastures. One of these pastures was also used as a winter-feeding area. Surface runoff volumes and peak rates from the three pastures used only for summer grazing were generally less as compared with values for earlier years when the fields were in meadow and fight pasturing; however, runoff from the winterfeeding area was markedly increased. Both before and after the initiation of grazing, the areas used only for summer grazing had but a trace of soil loss. More soil was lost from the winter-feeding area, particularly during the dormant season. Water-balance studies indicated that during the growing season surface runoff and subsurface outflow were higher and evapotranspiration (ET) was less from the winter-feeding area than from areas summer-grazed only. During the dormant season, surface runoff was higher and subsurface outflow was lower from the winter-feeding area than from the summer-grazed areas, whereas ET was similar.

Key Words: surface runoff • subsurface flow • soil erosion • water balance • winter-feeding


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Agron., Ohio Agric. Res. and Dev. Center, Wooster, OH 44691 in cooperation with USDA-SEA, AR, North Appalachian Exp. Watershed, Coshocton, OH 43812.

2 Professor of Agronomy, Ohio Agric. Res. and Dev. Center, Wooster; Statistician, USDA-SEA, AR, North Appalachian Experimental Watershed, Coshocton; and Soil Scientist, USDA-SEA, AR, Grassland, Soil and Water Res. Lab., Temple, TX 76501, formerly USDA-SEA, AR, North Appalachian Exp. Watershed, Coshocton.

Received for publication August 5, 1978.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
L. B. Owens and J. V. Bonta
Reduction of Nitrate Leaching with Haying or Grazing and Omission of Nitrogen Fertilizer
J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2004; 33(4): 1230 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1979 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.