JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 8:143-148 (1979)
© 1979 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heady, E. O.
Right arrow Articles by Vocke, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Heady, E. O.
Right arrow Articles by Vocke, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Heady, E. O.
Right arrow Articles by Vocke, G.

Programmed Impacts of Environmental Restraints Applied to U.S. Agriculture1

Earl O. Heady and Gary Vocke2

ABSTRACT

A national and interregional programming model is developed to evaluate the impact of potential restraints for soil loss and nitrogen on land use, crop production patterns, interregional competition, and economic variables. The model includes 105 producing regions with 5 land classes in each, 51 water supply regions, and 28 market regions. Crop and soil loss activities are defined for each land class in each producing region. The soil loss restraints would reduce gross soil loss through use of more contouring, strip cropping, terracing, and minimum tillage. Interregional reorganizations of agriculture are predicted to occur. Regions with greater rainfall and hilly land, particularly the southeastern U.S., would sacrifice in cropping share and farm income. Regions of level lands and less rainfall, particularly the Great Plains and part of the Corn Belt, would gain in cropping intensity and income. Under nitrogen restrictions more hectares of crops would be grown and pesticide expenditures would increase. Under all environmental alternatives analyzed, U.S. agriculture could meet U.S. food needs with small increases in the supply prices of food.

Key Words: environment • soil loss • nitrogen • production patterns • economic impacts


NOTES

1 Journal Paper number J-9032 of the Iowa Agric. and Home Econ. Exp. Stn., Ames, Iowa 50011. Proj. no. 2104.

2 Earl O. Heady is director of the Center for Agric. and Rural Dev. and C. F. Curtiss Distinguished Professor at Iowa State Univ., Ames, Iowa. Gary F. Vocke is assistant professor at North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, N.C.

Received for publication December 27, 1977.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1979 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.