JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 7:159-164 (1978)
© 1978 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ward, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, R. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ward, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, R. W.

Chemical Composition of Feedlot Manure1

G. M. Ward, T. V. Muscato, D. A. Hill and R. W. Hansen2

ABSTRACT

Manure samples were collected over a 10-mo period from a feedlot with conventional pens and pens in which about one-half the surface was covered with concrete. Samples were collected from the front, middle, and rear of each pen for each sampling period.

The average percentages of 139 samples on a dry matter basis were: dry matter, 58.5; ash, 37.0; total N, 2.32; neutral detergent fiber, 45.9; acid detergent fiber, 39.7; hemicellulose, 6.29; cellulose, 9.78; lignin, 7.67; and ADF insoluble ash, 25.3. Average pH was 7.09. The average percentages on a dry matter basis for 63 manure samples were: P, 0.54; K, 1.35; Ca, 1.88; and Na, 0.51.

Samples collected from concrete surfaces were 12.2% lower in ash because of less mising with soil. Effects of residence time of manure in the feedlot did not have a predictable effect upon composition because of the mixed influence of temperature, feedlot rations, and depth of the manure pack.

Key Words: ash • fiber • lignin • nitrogen


NOTES

1 Sponsored by the Natl. Environ. Res. Center under Grant no. R-803378-01-0.

2 Professor, Research Assistants, and Associate Professor, respectively, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Received for publication February 28, 1977.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. N. Miller, E. D. Berry, J. E. Wells, C. L. Ferrell, S. L. Archibeque, and H. C. Freetly
Influence of genotype and diet on steer performance, manure odor, and carriage of pathogenic and other fecal bacteria. III. Odorous compound production
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2533 - 2545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. L. Silveira, M. K. Miyittah, and G. A. O'Connor
Phosphorus Release from a Manure-Impacted Spodosol: Effects of a Water Treatment Residual
J. Environ. Qual., February 2, 2006; 35(2): 529 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
X. Hao, P. S. Mir, M. A. Shah, and G. R. Travis
Influence of Canola and Sunflower Diet Amendments on Cattle Feedlot Manure
J. Environ. Qual., July 5, 2005; 34(4): 1439 - 1445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1978 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.