JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 6:36-42 (1977)
© 1977 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scifres, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tai, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scifres, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tai, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Scifres, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tai, H.

Residual Properties of 2,4,5-T and Picloram in Sandy Rangeland Soils1

C. J. Scifres, H. G. McCall, R. Maxey and H. Tai2

ABSTRACT

Two watersheds were treated with one application of 2,4,5,T + picloram (1:1) at 1.12 kg/ha while one other watershed was treated for 2 consecutive years at the same herbicide rates. Residues of 2,4,5-T were reduced to trace levels [<10 parts per billion (ppb)] in soils 7 days after application at one location, after 28 days at the second, and after 56 days at the third. Residues of 2,4,5-T were not detected below 15 cm and usually remained in the surface 2.5 cm of soil. Picloram was reduced to trace levels within 56 to 112 days after application, was not detected deeper than 60 cm, and was usually restricted to the surface 15 cm of soil. There was no evidence of subsurface lateral movement of either herbicide. Surface runoff water contained trace amounts of residue following storms for about 30 days after application. There was no evidence of residue carry over into the second year after treatment in water, soils, or vegetation. Monitoring of cumulative residues in water, soils, and vegetation showed that about 75% of the picloram was dissipated from the ecosystem within 28 days after application and over 90% was lost after 112 days.

Key Words: herbicides • persistence • 2,4,5-T residues • picloram residues


NOTES

1 Published with approval of the Director, Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. as TA-12262. Work was conducted under Project H-1822, "Dissipation and Movement of Herbicide in Rangeland Soils."

2 Professor and Research Associate, Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. (Dep. Range Sci.), Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843; and Chemist and Director, Pestic, Monit. Lab., EPA, Bay St. Louis, Miss.

Received for publication December 11, 1975.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.