JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 4:526-531 (1975)
© 1975 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wallingford, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Manges, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wallingford, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Manges, H. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wallingford, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Manges, H. L.

Disposal of Beef-Feedlot Manure: Effects of Residual and Yearly Applications on Corn and Soil Chemical Properties1

G. W. Wallingford, L. S. Murphy, W. L. Powers and H. L. Manges2

ABSTRACT

Land disposal of beef-feedlot manure was studied. Annually, beginning in the fall of 1969, feedlot waste was applied to a silty clay loam soil at rates that after 4 years ranged from 114 to 2,750 metric tons/ha of dry manure. Included were three single applications made in the fall of 1969 (residual) that ranged from 123 to 590 dry metric tons/ha. For 3 years, in the spring and fall, surface soil samples and soil cores were taken. Yields of furrow-irrigated corn (Zea mays L.) forage and plant contents of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and Na were measured.

Chemical composition of manure from a single feedlot varied greatly. Average composition (dry weight basis) of samples collected for 3 years was 20.5% H2O, 0.92% N, 0.52% P, 1.14% K, 0.92% Ca, 0.41% Mg, and 0.26% Na. At all sampling dates electrical conductivities (EC) of extracts from saturated pastes of the surface soil samples from plots receiving yearly manure treatments were linearly related to cumulative tons of applied manure; EC values of more than 10 mmho/cm were recorded for the spring samplings. Both yearly and residual manure treatments caused Na and NO3-N to move downward accumulating to depths of at least 1 m after 3 years; movement of K and P was restricted to 50 and 30 cm, respectively. Corn-forage yields were increased by improved soil fertility at the low and intermediate yearly rates, but depressed at the high rates, probably because of salt injury. After 4 years forage yields were still increased on plots that received residual treatments. Uptake of N and P was also depressed at high yearly rates and followed trends similar to those of yield. Yearly rates ranging from 29 to 68 dry metric tons ha–1 year–1 produced near maximum forage yields without causing excessive salt accumulation in the soil.

Key Words: animal waste • nitrate • soil salinity • nutrient uptake


NOTES

1 Contribution No. 1433, Dep. of Agronomy, and No. 203, Dep. of Agricultural Engineering, Kansas Agric. Exp. Sta., Manhattan, KS 66506.

2 Research Assistant, Agronomist, Associate Agronomist, and Assistant Agricultural Engineer, Kansas State Univ. Senior author presently Assistant Professor of Soil Science, Univ. of Minnesota, Northwest Exp. Sta., Crookston, MN 56716.

Received for publication December 9, 1974.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
B. Eghball, D. Ginting, and J. E. Gilley
Residual Effects of Manure and Compost Applications on Corn Production and Soil Properties
Agron. J., March 1, 2004; 96(2): 442 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.