JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in J Environ Qual 4:491-495 (1975)
© 1975 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mortimer, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kudo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mortimer, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kudo, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mortimer, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kudo, A.

Interaction between Aquatic Plants and Bed Sediments in Mercury Uptake from Flowing Water1

D. C. Mortimer and Akira Kudo2

ABSTRACT

Bed sediment from a known zone in the Ottawa River study area and cuttings of Elodea densa were set out in aquaria in a 24-day controlled, flowing water experiment. Elodea was planted in sediment and in glass beads, and sediment was exposed with and without plants, all in the same aquaria for 7 days before the addition of mercury with 203Hg. Three concentrations each of mercuric chloride and methyl mercuric chloride were continuously metered into the input water to yield aquarium levels of 0.2, 2, and 10 µg/liter.

There was no significant difference in the uptake rate between the two forms of mercury. Uptake was proportional to water concentration over the entire 17-day exposure period in both plants and sediment. Methyl mercury was more toxic to plant growth in this time interval than inorganic mercury. Elodea growing in sediment absorbed significantly less mercury than Elodea growing in glass beads. Sediment from which the plants had been removed contained about twice as much mercury as plant-free sediment. The aquarium walls were the largest absorbing compartment in the system and methyl mercury was absorbed more strongly than inorganic mercury. The total recovery of input mercury over the 17 days averaged 91%.

Key Words: uptake coefficient • concentration factor • toxicity • fresh water


NOTES

1 This investigation is a part of the Ottawa River Project, a joint study by National Research Council of Canada Laboratories and the University of Ottawa. NRCC Publication No. 14860. Part of this paper was presented at the International Conference on Persistent Chemicals in Aquatic Ecosystems, Ottawa, May 1974.

2 Research Officers, Division of Biological Sciences, National Research Council of Canada Laboratories, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0R6.

Received for publication September 17, 1974.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.