JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 24 August 2009
Published in J Environ Qual 38:1981-1988 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2008.0056
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sharpley, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, A. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sharpley, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, A. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sharpley, A. N.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, A. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Nutrients
Right arrow Nutrient Management

Evaluating the Success of Phosphorus Management from Field to Watershed

Andrew N. Sharpleya,*, Peter J.A. Kleinmanb, Philip Jordanc, Lars Bergströmd and Arthur L. Allene

a Dep. of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, Division of Agriculture, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
b USDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit, Bldg. 3702, Curtin Rd., University Park, PA 16802
c Environmental Science, University of Ulster, Coleraine, N. Ireland (seconded to Teagasc, Wexford, Ireland)
d Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
e Univ. of Maryland Eastern Shore, Princess Anne, MD 21853

* Corresponding author (Sharpley{at}uark.edu).

Received for publication January 30, 2008. Studies have demonstrated some P loss reduction following implementation of remedial strategies at field scales. However, there has been little coordinated evaluation of best management practices (BMPs) on a watershed scale to show where, when, and which work most effectively. Thus, it is still difficult to answer with a degree of certainty, critical questions such as, how long before we see a response and where would we expect to observe the greatest or least response? In cases where field and watershed scales are monitored, it is not uncommon for trends in P loss to be disconnected. We review case studies demonstrating that potential causes of the disconnect varies, from competing sources of P at watershed scales that are not reflected in field monitoring to an abundance of sinks at watershed scales that buffer field sources. To be successful, P-based mitigation strategies need to occur iteratively, involve stakeholder driven programs, and address the inherent complexity of all P sources within watersheds.

Abbreviations: BMP, best management practices • EU, European Union • WFD, water framework directive




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
B. Kronvang, G. H. Rubaek, and G. Heckrath
International Phosphorus Workshop: Diffuse Phosphorus Loss to Surface Water Bodies--Risk Assessment, Mitigation Options, and Ecological Effects in River Basins
J. Environ. Qual., August 24, 2009; 38(5): 1924 - 1929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.