JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 June 2009
Published in J Environ Qual 38:1728-1738 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2008.0428
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Segal, E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Segal, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, S. A.
Right arrow Articles by Segal, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Microorganisms
Right arrow Microbial Processes
Right arrow Animal Waste
Right arrow Ground Water Quality

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Fate of Indicator Microorganisms Under Nutrient Management Plan Conditions

Scott A. Bradforda,* and Eran Segalb

a USDA-ARS, U.S. Salinity Lab., Riverside, CA 92507
b Dep. of Environmental Sciences, Univ. of California Riverside, CA

* Corresponding author (Scott.Bradford{at}ars.usda.gov).

Received for publication September 26, 2008. Nutrient management plans (NMPs) for application of wastewater from concentrated animal feeding operations are designed to meet crop water and nutrient requirements, but implicitly assume that pathogenic microorganisms in the wastewater will be retained and die-off in the root zone. A NMP was implemented on a field plot to test this assumption by monitoring the fate of several fecal indicator microorganisms (Enterococcus, fecal coliforms, somatic coliphage, and total Escherichia coli). When well-water and wastewater were applied to meet measured evapotranspiration (ET), little advective transport of the indicator microorganisms occurred below the root zone and the remaining microorganisms rapidly died-off (within 1 mo). Additional experiments were conducted in the laboratory to better quantify microorganism transport and survival in the field soil. Batch survival experiments revealed much more rapid die-off rates for the bacterial indicator microorganisms in native than in sterilized soil, suggesting that biotic factors controlled survival. Saturated column experiments with packed field soil, demonstrated much greater transport potential for somatic coliphage than bacterial indicators (Enterococcus and total E. coli) and that the retention rates for the indicator microorganisms were not log-linear with depth. A worst case transport scenario of ponded infiltration on a large undistributed soil column from the field was also initiated and indicator microorganisms were not detected in the column outflow or in the soil at a depth of 65 cm. All of these observations support the hypothesis that a NMP at this site will protect groundwater supplies from microorganism contamination, especially when applied water and wastewater meet ET.

Abbreviations: CAFO, concentrated animal feeding operation • DAE, day after emergence • ET, evapotranspiration • NMP, nutrient management plan







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.