JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 June 2009
Published in J Environ Qual 38:1580-1590 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2008.0317
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplement
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rowland, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bradfield, G. E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rowland, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bradfield, G. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rowland, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bradfield, G. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecosystem Restoration
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Soil Organic Matter
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling
Right arrow Forest Soils

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Recreating a Functioning Forest Soil in Reclaimed Oil Sands in Northern Alberta: An Approach for Measuring Success in Ecological Restoration

S. M. Rowlanda, C. E. Prescotta,*, S. J. Graystona, S. A. Quideaub and G. E. Bradfieldc

a Dep. of Forest Sciences, Univ. of British Columbia, 3041-2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
b Dep. of Renewable Resources, Univ. of Alberta, 442 Earth Science Bldg., Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
c Dep. of Botany, Univ. of British Columbia, 3529-6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada

* Corresponding author (cindy.prescott{at}ubc.ca).

Received for publication July 10, 2008. During oil-sands mining all vegetation, soil, overburden, and oil sand is removed, leaving pits several kilometers wide and up to 100 m deep. These pits are reclaimed through a variety of treatments using subsoil or a mixed peat-mineral soil cap. Using nonmetric multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis of measurements of ecosystem function, reclamation treatments of several age classes were compared with a range of natural forest ecotypes to discover which treatments had created ecosystems similar to natural forest ecotypes and at what age this occurred. Ecosystem function was estimated from bioavailable nutrients, plant community composition, litter decomposition rate, and development of a surface organic layer. On the reclamation treatments, availability of nitrate, calcium, magnesium, and sulfur were generally higher than in the natural forest ecotypes, while ammonium, P, K, and Mn were generally lower. Reclamation treatments tended to have more bare ground, grasses, and forbs but less moss, lichen, shrubs, trees, or woody debris than natural forests. Rates of litter decomposition were lower on all reclamation treatments. Development of an organic layer appeared to be facilitated by the presence of shrubs. With repeated applications of fertilizers, measured variables for the peat-mineral amendments fell within the range of natural variability at about 20 yr. An intermediate subsoil layer reduced the need for fertilizer and conditions resembling natural forests were reached about 15 yr after a single fertilizer application. Treatments over tailings sand receiving only one application of fertilizer appeared to be on a different trajectory to a novel ecosystem.

Abbreviations: FH, fermented/humified surface organic matter • MRRP, multi-response permutation procedures • NMS, nonmetric multidimensional scaling • P-M, peat-mineral • PRS, plant root simulator







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.