JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 June 2009
Published in J Environ Qual 38:1569-1579 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2008.0483
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, J. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, J. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Hanson, J. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Dryland Soils
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Global Change
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Air Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Fertilizer Application Timing Influences Greenhouse Gas Fluxes Over a Growing Season

Rebecca L. Phillips*, Donald L. Tanaka, David W. Archer and Jon D. Hanson

USDA-ARS, Northern Great Plains Research Lab., 1701 10th Ave SW, Mandan, ND 58554. The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service is an equal opportunity/affirmative action employer and all agency services are available without discrimination. Mention of commercial products and organizations in this manuscript is solely to provide specific information. It does not constitute endorsement by USDA-ARS over other products and organizations not mentioned

* Corresponding author (Rebecca.phillips{at}ars.usda.gov).

Received for publication November 14, 2008. Microbial production and consumption of greenhouse gases (GHG) is influenced by temperature and nutrients, especially during the first few weeks after agricultural fertilization. The effect of fertilization on GHG fluxes should occur during and shortly after application, yet data indicating how application timing affects both GHG fluxes and crop yields during a growing season are lacking. We designed a replicated (n = 5) field experiment to test for the short-term effect of fertilizer application timing on fluxes of methane (CH4), carbon dioxide (CO2), and nitrous oxide (N2O) over a growing season in the northern Great Plains. Each 0.30-ha plot was planted to maize (Zea mays L.) and treated similarly with the exception of fertilizer timing: five plots were fertilized with urea in early spring (1 April) and five plots were fertilized with urea in late spring (13 May). We hypothesized time-integrated fluxes over a growing season would be greater for the late-spring treatment, resulting in a greater net GHG flux, as compared to the early-spring treatment. Data collected on 59 dates and integrated over a 5-mo time course indicated CO2 fluxes were greater (P < 0.0001) and CH4 fluxes were lower (P < 0.05) for soils fertilized in late spring. Net GHG flux was also significantly affected by treatment, with 0.84 ± 0.11 kg CO2 equivalents m–2 for early spring and 1.04 ± 0.13 kg CO2 equivalents m–2 for late spring. Nitrous oxide fluxes, however, were similar for both treatments. Results indicate fertilizer application timing influences net GHG emissions in dryland cropping systems.

Abbreviations: GHG, greenhouse gases • WFPS, water-filled pore space







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.