JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 20 May 2009
Published in J Environ Qual 38:1511-1517 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2008.0378
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watts, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Torbert, H. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watts, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Torbert, H. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Watts, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Torbert, H. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Runoff
Right arrow Nutrient Management

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Impact of Gypsum Applied to Grass Buffer Strips on Reducing Soluble P in Surface Water Runoff

D. B. Watts* and H. A. Torbert

USDA-ARS, National Soil Dynamics Lab., 41 S. Donahue Dr., Auburn, AL 36832

* Corresponding author (dwatts{at}ars.usda.gov).

Received for publication August 20, 2008. The threat of P transport from land applied manure has resulted in water quality concerns. Research was conducted to evaluate gypsum as a soil amendment applied to grass buffer strips for reducing soluble P in surface runoff. A simulated concentrated flow was created in an established tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) pasture. Poultry litter (PL) was applied at a rate of 250 kg N ha–1 to the upper 3.05 m of each plot, while gypsum was applied at rates of 0, 1, 3.2, and 5.6 Mg ha–1to the lower 1.52 m of the plot functioning as a grass buffer strip. Two 30-min runoff events (~4 L min–1) were conducted, immediately after PL application and 4 wk later to determined soluble P concentration in the surface water samples. The greatest concentration of soluble P was in the runoff event occurring immediately after the PL application. Gypsum applied to grass buffer strips was effective in reducing soluble P concentrations (32–40%) in surface runoff, while the untreated buffer strip was somewhat effective in reducing soluble P (18%). No significant differences were observed between gypsum rates, suggesting that land managers would achieve the greatest benefit from the lowest application rate (1Mgha–1). In the second runoff event, although concentrations of soluble P in the surface water runoff were greatly reduced, the effect of gypsum had disappeared. Thus, these results show that gypsum is most effective in reducing the initial P losses from PL application when applied to grass buffer strips. The information obtained from this study may be useful in aiding land managers in developing management practices that reduce soluble P loss at the edge of a field.

Abbreviations: BMP, best management practice • PL, poultry litter







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.