JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 25 March 2009
Published in J Environ Qual 38:841-854 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0565
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez-Ramirez, G.
Right arrow Articles by Van Scoyoc, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez-Ramirez, G.
Right arrow Articles by Van Scoyoc, G. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez-Ramirez, G.
Right arrow Articles by Van Scoyoc, G. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Global Change
Right arrow Air Pollution
Right arrow Animal Waste

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in an Eastern Corn Belt Soil: Weather, Nitrogen Source, and Rotation

Guillermo Hernandez-Ramireza, Sylvie M. Brouderb,*, Douglas R. Smithc and George E. Van Scoyocb

a USDA-ARS, National Soil Tilth Lab., Ames, IA 50011-3120
b Dep. of Agronomy, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907-2054
c USDA-ARS, National Soil Erosion Research Lab., West Lafayette, IN 47907-2054. Products and company names are necessary to report factually on available data; USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product or company, and the use of the name by USDA implies no approval of the product or company to the exclusion of others that may also be suitable

* Corresponding author (sbrouder{at}purdue.edu).

Received for publication October 25, 2007. Relative contributions of diverse, managed ecosystems to greenhouse gases are not completely documented. This study was conducted to estimate soil surface fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) as affected by management practices and weather. Gas fluxes were measured by vented, static chambers in Drummer and Raub soil series during two growing seasons. Treatments evaluated were corn cropped continuously (CC) or in rotation with soybean (CS) and fertilized with in-season urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN) or liquid swine manure applied in the spring (SM) or fall (FM). Soybean (SC) rotated with CS and restored prairie grass (PG) were also included. The CO2 fluxes correlated (P ≤ 0.001) with soil temperature ({rho}: 0.74) and accumulated rainfall 120 h before sampling ({rho}: 0.53); N2O fluxes correlated with soil temperature ({rho}: 0.34). Seasonal CO2–C emissions were not different across treatments (4.4 Mg ha–1 yr–1) but differed between years. Manured soils were net seasonal CH4–C emitters (0.159–0.329 kg ha–1 yr–1), whereas CSUAN and CCUAN exhibited CH4–C uptake (–0.128 and –0.177 kg ha–1 yr–1, respectively). Treatments significantly influenced seasonal N2O–N emissions (P < 0.001) and ranged from <1.0 kg ha1 yr–1 in PG and SC to between 3 and 5 kg ha–1 yr–1 in CCFM and CSUAN and >8 kg ha–1 yr–1 in CCSM; differences were driven by pulse emissions after N fertilization in concurrence with major rainfall events. These results suggest fall manure application, corn–soybean rotation, and restoration of prairies may diminish N2O emissions and hence contribute to global warming mitigation.

Abbreviations: CC, continuous corn • CS, corn phase of corn–soybean rotation • CSR, average of the two phases of the corn–soybean rotation • DAST, daily average soil temperature • DFgas, daily gas flux estimate • Dev Fgas, midday gas flux deviation from a mean • FCH4, methane flux • FCO2, CO2 flux • Fgas, midday gas flux • FM, fall liquid swine manure • FN2O, nitrous oxide flux • GHG, greenhouse gases • PG, restored prairie grass • RM ANCOVA, repeated measures analysis of covariance • SC, soybean phase of corn–soybean rotation • SM, spring liquid swine manure • ST, soil temperature • UAN, urea-ammonium nitrate




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. D. Logsdon, G. Hernandez-Ramirez, J. L. Hatfield, T. J. Sauer, J.H. Prueger, and K. E. Schilling
Soil Water and Shallow Groundwater Relations in an Agricultural Hillslope
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 14, 2009; 73(5): 1461 - 1468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
G. Hernandez-Ramirez, S. M. Brouder, D. R. Smith, G. E. Van Scoyoc, and G. Michalski
Nitrous Oxide Production in an Eastern Corn Belt Soil: Sources and Redox Range
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 13, 2009; 73(4): 1182 - 1191.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.