HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tesfamariam, E. H. Articles by Stirzaker, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tesfamariam, E. H. Articles by Stirzaker, R. J. Agricola Articles by Tesfamariam, E. H. Articles by Stirzaker, R. J. Related Collections Turfgrass Management Municipal Wastes Turfgrass Nutrient Cycling Nutrient Management

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Exporting Large Volumes of Municipal Sewage Sludge through Turfgrass Sod Production

^a Dep. of Plant Production and Soil Science, Univ. of Pretoria, Pretoria, 0002, Republic of South Africa
^b CSIRO Land and Water, PO Box 1666, ACT 2601, Australia and CRC for Irrigation Futures, PO Box 56, Darling Heights, Queensland, Australia 4350

^* Corresponding authors (john.annandale{at}up.ac.za, tesfamariam{at}tuks.co.za).

Received for publication September 4, 2008. The nutrient content of sludge produced by municipal water treatment works often far exceeds the requirements of nearby crops. Transporting sludge further afield is not always economically viable. This study reports on the potential to export large volumes of anaerobically digested municipal sewage sludge through turfgrass sod production. Hypotheses examined are that sludge loading rates far above recommendations based on crop nutrient removal (i) are possible without reducing turf growth and quality, (ii) do not cause an accumulation of N and P below the active root zone, (iii) can minimize soil loss through sod harvesting, and (iv) do not cause unacceptably high nitrate and salt leaching. An 8 Mg ha^–1 sludge control (the recommended limit) was compared with sludge rates of 0, 33, 67, and 100 Mg ha^–1 on a loamy, kaolinitic, mesic, Typic Eutrustox soil near Johannesburg, South Africa. Sludge application rates up to 67 Mg ha^–1 significantly improved turfgrass establishment rate and color. The ability of sods to remain intact during handling and transport improved as the sludge application rate increased to 33 Mg ha^–1 but deteriorated at higher rates. A sludge application rate of 100 Mg ha^–1 was needed to eliminate soil loss, but this rate was associated with unacceptably high N leaching losses. All our hypotheses were accepted for application rates not exceeding 33 Mg ha^–1 on the proviso that some soil loss was acceptable and that the leaching fraction was carefully managed during the first 2 mo after sludge application.

Abbreviations: EC, electrical conductivity • LF, leaching fraction • WFD, wetting front detector