HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Faucette, L. B. Articles by Governo, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Faucette, L. B. Articles by Governo, J. Agricola Articles by Faucette, L. B. Articles by Governo, J. Related Collections Watershed and Landscape Processes Surface Water Quality Soil Erosion Best Management Practices Runoff

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Surface Water Quality

Large-Scale Performance and Design for Construction Activity Erosion Control Best Management Practices

^a Research Ecologist/Director, Filtrexx International, 551 East Lake Dr, Decatur, GA 30030
^b Graduate Student, San Diego State University
^c Assistant Professor, San Diego State University
^d Senior Engineer, Compost Wizard

^* Corresponding author (brittf{at}filtrexx.com).

Received for publication September 16, 2008. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Phase II requires construction activities to have erosion and sediment control best management practices (BMPs) designed and installed for site storm water management. Although BMPs are specified on storm water pollution prevention plans (SWPPPs) as part of the construction general permit (GP), there is little evidence in the research literature as to how BMPs perform or should be designed. The objectives of this study were to: (i) comparatively evaluate the performance of common construction activity erosion control BMPs under a standardized test method, (ii) evaluate the performance of compost erosion control blanket thickness, (iii) evaluate the performance of compost erosion control blankets (CECBs) on a variety of slope angles, and (iv) determine Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) cover management factors (C factors) for these BMPs to assist site designers and engineers. Twenty-three erosion control BMPs were evaluated using American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) D-6459, standard test method for determination of ECB performance in protecting hill slopes from rainfall induced erosion, on 4:1 (H:V), 3:1, and 2:1 slopes. Soil loss reduction for treatments exposed to 5 cm of rainfall on a 2:1 slope ranged from-7 to 99%. For rainfall exposure of 10 cm, treatment soil loss reduction ranged from 8 to 99%. The 2.5 and 5 cm CECBs significantly reduced erosion on slopes up to 2:1, while CECBs < 2.5 cm are not recommended on slopes 4:1 when rainfall totals reach 5 cm. Based on the soil loss results, USLE C factors ranged from 0.01 to 0.9. These performance and design criteria should aid site planners and designers in decision-making processes.

Abbreviations: BMP, best management practice • CECBs, compost erosion control blankets • GP, general permit • NPDES, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System • PAM, polyacrylamide • RECBs, rolled erosion control blankets • RO, reverse osmosis • SERL, Soil Erosion Research Laboratory • SWPPPs, storm water pollution prevention plans