HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Agyin-Birikorang, S. Articles by Capece, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Agyin-Birikorang, S. Articles by Capece, J. C. Agricola Articles by Agyin-Birikorang, S. Articles by Capece, J. C. Related Collections Phosphorus Municipal Wastes Nutrient Management Other Soil Management Ground Water Quality

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Efficacy of Drinking-Water Treatment Residual in Controlling Off-Site Phosphorus Losses: A Field Study in Florida

^a Soil and Water Sci. Dep., Univ. Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0510
^b Dep. Crop and Soil Sci., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824
^c Southern DataStream, Inc., 6017 NW 27th Terrace, Gainesville, FL 32652

^* Corresponding author (agyin{at}ufl.edu).

Received for publication August 23, 2008. Land application of drinking-water treatment residuals (WTR) has been shown to control excess soil soluble P and can reduce off-site P losses to surface and ground water. To our knowledge, no field study has directly evaluated the impacts of land application of WTRs on ground water quality. We monitored the effects of three organic sources of P (poultry manure, Boca Raton biosolids, Pompano biosolids) or triple superphosphate co-applied with an aluminum-based WTR (Al-WTR) on soil and ground water P and Al concentrations under natural field conditions for 20 mo in a soil with limited P sorption capacity. The P sources were applied at two rates (based on P or nitrogen [N] requirement of bahiagrass) with or without Al-WTR amendment and replicated three times. Without WTR application, applied P sources increased surface soil soluble P concentrations regardless of the P source or application rate. Co-applying the P sources with Al-WTR prevented increases in surface soil soluble P concentrations and reduced P losses to shallow ground water. Total dissolved P and orthophosphate concentrations of shallow well ground water of the N-based treatments were greater (>0.9 and 0.3 mg L^–1, respectively) in the absence than in the presence (0.6 and 0.2 mg L^–1, respectively) of Al-WTR. The P-based application rate did not increase ground water P concentrations relative to background concentrations. Notwithstanding, Al-WTR amendment decreased ground water P concentrations from soil receiving treatments with P-based application rates. Ground water total dissolved Al concentrations were unaffected by soil Al-WTR application. We conclude that, at least for the study period, Al-WTR can be safely used to reduce P leaching into ground water without increasing the Al concentration of ground water.

Abbreviations: BMP, best management practice • DPS, degree of phosphorus saturation • ICP–AES, inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission spectroscopy • PAN, plant-available nitrogen • TDP, total dissolved phosphorus • TSP, triple superphosphate • WEP, water-extractable phosphorus • WTR, drinking-water treatment residual • Al-WTR, aluminum-based WTR