HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Free via Open Access Figures Only OA Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free An erratum has been published Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gottschall, N. Articles by Lapen, D. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Gottschall, N. Articles by Lapen, D. R. Agricola Articles by Gottschall, N. Articles by Lapen, D. R. Related Collections Water Quality Municipal Wastes Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport Municipal Waste

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Vadose Zone Processes and Chemical Transport

Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Bacteria Tile and Groundwater Quality Following Direct Injection of Dewatered Municipal Biosolids into Soil

^a Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1A 0C6
^b Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, London, ON
^c Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Rural Affairs, Stratford, ON
^d Univ. of Guelph-Kemptville, Kemptville, ON

^* Corresponding author (david.lapen{at}agr.gc.ca).

Received for publication February 14, 2008. Application of municipal biosolids (sewage) to agricultural land is a common practice to improve soil physical quality and fertility. The chosen method of land application can have a strong impact on the extent of adjacent water contamination by nutrients and bacteria. Dewatered municipal biosolids (DMB) were applied to silt-clay loam experimental field plots in Ontario, Canada using two application methods: (i) surface spreading followed by shallow incorporation (SS) and (ii) a newly developed implement that directly injects DMB into the topsoil (DI). The objective of this study was to compare N, P, and bacteria quality of tile drainage and shallow groundwater associated with each land application technique. There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in N, P, and bacteria tile mass loads among the application treatments for time periods <100 d postapplication, when the greatest peak loads and peak tile water concentrations were observed. Both land application treatments caused groundwater Escherichia coli contamination to at least 1.2 m depth below surface after the first postapplication rainfall event, and NO₃–N contamination to at least 2.0 m depth below surface. The DI treatment did, however, have significantly (P < 0.05) higher tile mass loads of total Kjeldahl N (TKN), total phosphorus (TP), E. coli, Enterococci, and Clostridium perfringens relative to the SS treatment for time periods >100 d postapplication. Nevertheless, relative to tile effluent data collected <100 d postapplication (no application treatment differences), peak loads, and concentrations during this time were, overall, considerably lower for both treatments. This finding, along with no significant differences in N, P, and bacteria groundwater concentrations among the application treatments, and that the direct injection technique could potentially reduce vector attraction problems and odor, suggests that the direct injection technique should be considered a dewatered municipal biosolid land application option.

Abbreviations: DMB, dewatered municipal biosolids • BDL, below detection limit • C, control • DI, direct injection • DOY, day of year • LMB, liquid municipal biosolids • SS, surface spreading • TKN, total Kjeldahl nitrogen • TP, total phosphorus