JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 March 2009
Published in J Environ Qual 38:826-835 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2008.0182
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fragoulis, G.
Right arrow Articles by Capri, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fragoulis, G.
Right arrow Articles by Capri, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fragoulis, G.
Right arrow Articles by Capri, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Crop Management
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Organic farming
Right arrow Other Crops
Right arrow Ecological Risk Assessment

SHORT COMMUNICATIONS

Development of a Management Tool to Indicate the Environmental Impact of Organic Viticulture

Georgios Fragoulisa, Marco Trevisana, Andrea Di Guardob, Andrea Sorceb, Markus van der Meerc, Franco Weibelc and Ettore Capria,*

a Istituto di Chimica Agraria ed Ambientale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29100 Piacenza, Italy
b Informatica Ambientale S.r.l., Via Teodosio, 13, 20131 Milan, Italy
c Forschungsinstitut für Biologischen Landbau, Ackerstrasse, 5070 Frick, Switzerland

* Corresponding author (ettore.capri{at}unicatt.it).

Received for publication April 19, 2008. Organic viticulture is an important part of the European Union organic farming sector, and, according to the most recent surveys, 1.5% of European Union wine originates from organic farms, with an upward trend. This paper describes an environmental impact of an organic viticulture indicator (EIOVI) that can be reliably used in the management of organic vineyards. The EIOVI can be used as a decision support system for farmers and other property managers by evaluating the potential ecological impact of their choices, thus optimizing management options. The tool allows the simulation of vineyard management based on six agricultural and ecological modules. The EIOVI is a fuzzy expert system that calculates the relationship between the modules on the basis of a set of 64 decision rules. Initial testing (validation) has been performed using 20 simulations for six Swiss wine-growing estates. The results of these tests were promising; the EIOVI motivates managers to consider the wine-growing estate as a whole by subsummarizing all aspects of management. The visualization of results is very tangible and clearly shows that the use of this indicator could improve the management of the vineyard. With some improvements, the EIOVI will be a helpful assessment tool for vine growers, consultants, environmental agencies, and scientists.

Abbreviations: AAOMI, actual annual organic matter input from compost (or manure) and cover crop residues • AAOMIC, actual annual organic matter input from compost (or manure) use • AAOMICCR, actual annual organic matter input from cover crops • BI, biodiversity indicator • CFUI, commercial fertilizer use indicator • CMFKI, compost or fertilizer potassium indicator • CMFNI, compost or fertilizer nitrogen indicator • CMFPI, compost or fertilizer phosphorus indicator • CVCRI, cover crop indicator • DTI, deficit threshold indicator • EC, electrical conductivity • EIOVI, environmental impact of organic viticulture indicator • FMI, fertilizer management indicator • KAT, potassium available for plant uptake (total) • KDF, potassium demand from fertilizer • LSCI, level of soil compaction indicator • MPAI, machinery power and age indicator • MPI, machinery power per hours of use indicator • NAT, nitrogen available for plant uptake (total) • NDF, nitrogen demand from fertilizer • PAT, phosphorus available for plant uptake (total) • PDF, phosphorus demand from fertilizer • PEC, predicted environmental concentration • PDMI, pest and disease management indicator • RDI, regulated deficit irrigation • SMMUI, soil management and machinery use indicator • SOMI, soil organic matter indicator • VBA, volume balance approach • WMII, water management infiltration indicator • WMIRI, water management irrigation rate indicator • WMITI, water management ion toxicity indicator • WMQI, water management quality indicator • WMSI, water management salinity indicator







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.