JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 25 February 2009
Published in J Environ Qual 38:792-803 (2009)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0506
© 2009 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Banaitis, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dail, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Banaitis, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dail, D. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Banaitis, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dail, D. B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Pollution
Right arrow Forest Soils
Right arrow Municipal Waste

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Biogeochemical Response of a Northeastern Forest Ecosystem to Biosolids Amendments

Michael R. Banaitisa, Ivan J. Fernandeza,*, Cullen Wilsona, Stephen A. Nortonb and D. Bryan Daila

a Dep. of Plant, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469
b Dep. of Earth Sciences, Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469

* Corresponding author (ivanjf{at}maine.edu).

Received for publication September 22, 2007. In the northeastern United States interest in the use of biosolids on forest lands is growing due to the prevalence of extensive forests and market incentives for waste disposal, yet much of the regulatory framework for biosolids land application is based on agronomic practice. This study evaluated the response of soils in a young (~20 yr old) deciduous forest to lime-stabilized biosolids amendments focusing on (i) the temporal and spatial evolution of the pH response, (ii) soil exchangeable cation response, (iii) the risk of trace metal accumulations, and (iv) a bioindicator of treatments (i.e., foliar chemistry). Eighteen plots were established in two study phases with lime-stabilized biosolids loading targets of 0 (control), 4.5, 6.7, 13.4, 20.2, 26.9, and 33.6 Mg (megagram) calcium carbonate equivalents (CCE) ha–1, with the lowest target rate of addition representing the current regulated loading limit for forest biosolids applications in Maine. The pH of the O horizon increased immediately >2 pH units, and then declined with time, while B horizon pH increased gradually, taking over 1 yr to achieve ~1.0 pH unit increase at the highest loading target. O-horizon exchangeable Ca concentration increases dominated soil chemical change and resulted in decreases in exchangeable H and Al. Few significant increases in soil trace metal concentrations had occurred at any soil depth after 1 yr of treatment. Foliar response generally reflected changes in soil chemistry, with Ca concentration increases most significant. This research provides critical insights on forest soil response to application of lime-stabilized biosolids and suggests opportunities for higher loading targets in forests should be examined.

Abbreviations: CCE, calcium carbonate equivalence • CEC, cation exchange capacity • LOI, loss-on-ignition • NVS, N-Viro soil • RCB, randomized complete block design







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.