HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sharma, R. Articles by Yu, Z. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sharma, R. Articles by Yu, Z. Agricola Articles by Sharma, R. Articles by Yu, Z. Related Collections Sustainable Agriculture Fate Best Management Practices Animal Waste Industrial Waste

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Selected Antimicrobial Resistance during Composting of Manure from Cattle Administered Sub-Therapeutic Antimicrobials

^a Agriculture and Agri-Food Research Centre, 5403-1st Ave. S., Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1
^b Southern Crop Protection and Food Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 1391 Sandford St., London, Ontario, Canada N5V 4T3
^c Dep. of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Contributed equally: F.J. Larney and J. Chen

^* Corresponding author (sharmar{at}agr.gc.ca).

Received for publication December 10, 2007. Composting is being increasingly employed for the recycling of nutrients in manure from the livestock industry. However, composting manure from animals fed antimicrobials has not been well characterized. In this study, compost windrows were prepared using manure collected from cattle (Bos Taurus L.) fed tylosin (TY), chlortetracycline-sulphamethazine (TS), and control cattle (no antimicrobials). The objectives of the 18-wk trial were to quantitatively assess the survival of total E. coli, E. coli resistant to ampicillin (Amp^r) and tetracycline (Tet^r), and select tetracycline (tet) and erythromycin resistance methylase (erm) genes. We found that while compost windrows did not reach the recommended temperature of 55°C for 15 d, composting reduced high initial levels of total, Amp^r, and Tet^r E. coli as early as Week 2. A significant antimicrobial effect on total (P = 0.04) and Amp^r (P = 0.03) E. coli was observed. Significant antimicrobial x time interactions were observed from Week 0 to Week 3 (Total E. coli: P = 0.04; Amp^r: P = 0.02; Tet^r: P = <0.001). Low absolute abundance of tet and erm genes (<10⁶ copies g^–1) was found and the resistance genes displayed different dynamics; tet(A,C) and erm(A) increased marginally at Week 11 relative to Week 0 and 5 and the remaining genes (tet(G), RPP tet, erm(B), erm(C), erm(F), erm(T), and erm(X)) decreased for most time points and treatments. These results indicate that even though composting reduces antimicrobial resistant E. coli, tet and erm genes could still be detected. Our experiments reiterate advantages of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based quantitative assays over cultivation-based methods for the rapid identification of composting effectiveness in eliminating resistance genes before land application.

Abbreviations: Amp^r, ampicillin resistant • AR, antimicrobial resistance • CFU, colony forming units • E. coli, Escherichia coli • erm, erythromycin resistance methylase gene • MAC, MacConkey agar • MAC_amp, MacConkey agar containing ampicillin • MAC_tet, MacConkey agar containing tetracycline hydrochloride • tet, tetracycline resistance gene • RPP, ribosomal protection protein • Tet^r, tetracycline resistant • TS, chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine • TY, tylosin