HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Robertson, W. D. Articles by Merkley, L. C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Robertson, W. D. Articles by Merkley, L. C. Agricola Articles by Robertson, W. D. Articles by Merkley, L. C. Related Collections Nitrogen Bioremediation and Biodegradation

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Surface Water Quality

In-Stream Bioreactor for Agricultural Nitrate Treatment

^a Dep. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1,Canada
^b Upper Thames River Conservation Authority, London, ON, Canada

^* Corresponding author (wroberts{at}sciborg.uwaterloo.ca).

Received for publication February 23, 2008. Nitrate from agricultural activity contributes to nutrient loading in surface water bodies such as the Mississippi River. This study demonstrates a novel in-stream bioreactor that uses carbonaceous solids (woodchips) to promote denitrification of agricultural drainage. The reactor (40 m³) was trenched into the bottom of an existing agricultural drainage ditch in southern Ontario (Avon site), and flow was induced through the reactor by construction of a gravel riffle in the streambed. Over the first 1.5 yr of operation, mean influent NO₃–N of 4.8 mg L^–1 was attenuated to 1.04 mg L^–1 at a mean reactor flow rate of 24 L min^–1. A series of flow-step tests, facilitated by an adjustable height outlet pipe, demonstrated that nitrate mass removal generally increased with increasing flow rate. When removal rates were not nitrate-limited, areal mass removal ranged from 11 mg N m^–2 h^–1 at 3°C to 220 mg N m^–2 h^–1 at 14°C (n = 27), exceeding rates reported for some surface-flow constructed wetlands in this climatic region by a factor of about 40. Over the course of the field trial, reactor flow rates decreased as a result of silt accumulation on top of the gravel infiltration gallery. Design modifications are currently being implemented to mitigate the effects of siltation. In-stream reactors have the potential to be scaled larger and could be more manageable than attempting to address nitrate loading from individual tile drains. They could also work well in combination with other nitrate control techniques.