JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 October 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:2108-2115 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2008.0023
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tazehkand, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tazehkand, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, S. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tazehkand, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Walker, S. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Microbiology
Right arrow Microorganisms
Right arrow Microbial Processes
Right arrow Microbial and Colloid Transport Models

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Ground Water Quality

Cell Preparation Methods Influence Escherichia coli D21g Surface Chemistry and Transport in Saturated Sand

Shiva S. Tazehkanda, Saeed Torkzabanb, Scott A. Bradfordc,* and Sharon L. Walkerb

a Dep. of Earth Sciences, Utrecht Univ., Utrecht, the Netherlands
b Dep. of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA
c USDA, ARS, U.S. Salinity Lab., Riverside, CA

* Corresponding author (Scott.Bradford{at}ars.usda.gov).

Received for publication January 15, 2008. The effect of cell preparation methods on the surface chemistry and retention of Escherichia coli D21 g was investigated over a range of ionic strength conditions. The cell preparation methods that were considered included filtration and centrifugation (at various speeds and for different durations). For a given ionic strength condition, it was found that cells prepared by filtration were more negatively charged and hydrophobic than cells prepared by centrifugation. Increasing the centrifugation speed (force imposed) or duration produced cells with a higher zeta potential (less negative) and a lower hydrophobicity. Column transport experiments for E. coli D21 g were also conducted with ultra pure quartz sand and the same solution chemistries. The first-order retention rate coefficient for E. coli D21 g increased with increasing speed and duration of centrifugation, and was lowest in the case of filtered cells. Moreover, the influence of cell preparation method was more pronounced in lower ionic strength solutions.

Abbreviations: BTC, breakthrough curves • DLVO, Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek • EPS, extra-cellulaar polymeric substances • IS, ionic strength • LB, Luria–Bertani • LPS, lipopolysaccharides • MATH, microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.