JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 October 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:2083-2092 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0304
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holley, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, L.-K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holley, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, L.-K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Holley, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, L.-K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecosystem Management
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Microorganisms
Right arrow Animal Waste

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Ecological Risk Assessment

Examination of Salmonella and Escherichia coli Translocation from Hog Manure to Forage, Soil, and Cattle Grazed on the Hog Manure-treated Pasture

Richard Holleya,*, Joël Walktya, Gregory Blanka, Mario Tenutab, Kimberly Ominskic, Denis Krausec and Lai-King Ngd

a Dep. Food Science, Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg MB R3T 2N2, Canada
b Dep. Soil Science, Univ. of Manitoba
c Dep. Animal Science, Univ. of Manitoba
d National Microbiology Lab., Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB

* Corresponding author (rick_holley{at}umanitoba.ca).

Received for publication June 12, 2007. Use of hog (Sus scrofa) manure as a fertilizer is a practical solution for waste re-utilization, however, it may serve as a vehicle for environmental and domestic animal contamination. Work was conducted to determine whether pathogens, naturally present in hog manure could be detected in cattle (Bos taurus) grazed on the manure-treated pasture, and whether forage contamination occurred. During two 3 mo summer trials manure was applied to yield ≤124 kg available N per hectare in a single spring or split spring and fall application. Samples of hog manure, forage, soil, and cattle feces were analyzed for naturally occurring Salmonella, Yersinia enterocolitica, and Escherichia coli. To follow movement of Salmonella in the environment isolates were identified to serovar and serotyped. Transfer of E. coli from hog manure to soil and cattle was examined by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis of >600 E. coli isolates. While Y. enterocolitica was absent from all samples, in both years S. enterica Derby and S. enterica Krefeld were found in most hog manure samples, but were only on forage samples in the second year. Salmonella enterica Typhimurium, absent from hog manure was present on some forage in the first year. Cattle feces and soil samples were consistently Salmonella negative. These contaminations could not be traced to manure application. During this study, Salmonella and E. coli found in hog manure had different RAPD genomic profiles from those found in the feces of cattle grazing on manure-treated pasture.

Abbreviations: CFU, colony forming units • DRT, decimal reduction time • RAPD, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.