JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 October 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:2037-2047 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2008.0027
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oelbermann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schiff, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oelbermann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schiff, S. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Oelbermann, M.
Right arrow Articles by Schiff, S. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ecosystem Management
Right arrow Isotopes
Right arrow Biogeochemical Processes
Right arrow Carbon Sequestration
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Quantifying Carbon Dioxide and Methane Emissions and Carbon Dynamics from Flooded Boreal Forest Soil

Maren Oelbermanna,* and Sherry L. Schiffb

a Dep. of Environment and Resource Studies, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON Canada N2L 3G1
b Dep. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON Canada N2L 3G1

* Corresponding author (moelberm{at}fes.uwaterloo.ca).

Received for publication January 16, 2008. The boreal forest is subject to natural and anthropogenic disturbances, but the production of greenhouse gases as a result of flooding for hydroelectric power generation has received little attention. It was hypothesized that flooded soil would result in greater CO2 and CH4 emissions and carbon (C) fractionation compared with non-flooded soil. To evaluate this hypothesis, soil C and nitrogen (N) dynamics, CO2 and CH4 mean production rates, and 13C fractionation in laboratory incubations at 14 and 21°C under non-flooded and flooded conditions and its effect on labile and recalcitrant C sources were determined. A ferro-humic Podzol was collected at three different sites at the Experimental Lakes Area, Canada, with a high (19,834 g C m–2), medium (18,066 g C m–2), and low (11,060 g C m–2) soil organic C (SOC) stock. Soil organic C and total N stocks (g m–2) and concentrations (g kg–1) were significantly different (p < 0.05) among soil horizons within each of the three sites. Stable isotope analysis showed a significant enrichment in {delta}13C and {delta}15N with depth and an enrichment in {delta}13C and {delta}15N with decreasing SOC and N concentration. The mean CO2 and CH4 production rates were greatest in soil horizons with the highest SOC stock and were significantly higher at 21°C and in flooded treatments. The {delta}13C of the evolved CO2 ({delta}13C-CO2) became significantly enriched with time during decomposition, and the greatest degree of fractionation occurred in the organic Litter, Fungal, and Humic forest soil horizons and in soil with a high SOC stock compared with the mineral horizon and soil with a lower SOC stock. The {delta}13C-CO2 was significantly depleted in flooded treatments compared with non-flooded treatments.

Abbreviations: CHR, charred layer • ELA, Experimental Lakes Area • GHG, greenhouse gases • JP-B, Jack pine-Betula • JP-L, Jack pine-Ledum • JP-P, Jack pine-Polytrichum • OE, organic matter enriched • SOC, soil organic carbon • SOM, soil organic matter







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.