HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ni, J.-Q. Articles by Schmidt, A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ni, J.-Q. Articles by Schmidt, A. M. Agricola Articles by Ni, J.-Q. Articles by Schmidt, A. M. Related Collections Best Management Practices Field-Scale Studies Organic Compounds Air Pollution Animal Waste

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emission from Two Pig Finishing Barns

^a Dep. of Agric. & Biological Engineering, Purdue Univ., 225 S. University St., West Lafayette, IN 47907
^b 229 Agric. Engineering Bldg., Univ. of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211. Journal Contribution no. 2007-18261 of Purdue Univ. Agricultural Research Programs. The primary version of the paper was presented at the Livestock Environmental Initiative Conference, February 7–8, 2005, Toronto, Canada

^* Corresponding author (jiqin{at}purdue.edu).

Received for publication July 22, 2007. Agricultural activities are an important source of greenhouse gases. However, comprehensive, long-term, and high-quality measurement data of these gases are lacking. This article presents a field study of CH₄ and CO₂ emission from two 1100-head mechanically ventilated pig (Sus scrofa) finishing barns (B1 and B2) with shallow manure flushing systems and propane space heaters from August 2002 to July 2003 in northern Missouri. Barn 2 was treated with soybean oil sprinkling, misting essential oils, and misting essential oils with water to reduce air pollutant emissions. Only days with CDFB (complete-data-full-barn), defined as >80% of valid data during a day with >80% pigs in the barns, were used. The CH₄ average daily mean (ADM) emission rates were 36.2 ± 2.0 g/d AU (ADM ± 95% confidence interval; animal unit = 500 kg live mass) from B1 (CDFB days = 134) and 28.8 ± 1.8 g/d AU from B2 (CDFB days = 131). The CO₂ ADM emission rates were 17.5 ± 0.8 kg/d AU from B1 (CDFB days = 146) and 14.2 ± 0.6 kg/d AU from B2 (CDFB days = 137). The treated barn reduced CH₄ emission by 20% (P < 0.01) and CO₂ emission by 19% (P < 0.01). The CH₄ and CO₂ released from the flushing lagoon effluent were equivalent to 9.8 and 4.1% of the CDFB CH₄ and CO₂ emissions, respectively. The emission data were compared with the literature, and the characteristics of CH₄ and CO₂ concentrations and emissions were discussed.

Abbreviations: ADM, average daily mean • AU, animal unit, equals 500 kg live mass • CD, complete data, defined as > 80% of valid data during a day for a single measurement • CDFB, complete-data-full-barn day, defined as > 80% of valid data during a day with > 80% pigs in the barns • DAC, data acquisition and control • RH, relative humidity