JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 8 August 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:1986-1992 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0461
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bolster, C. H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bolster, C. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bolster, C. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Phosphorus
Right arrow Nutrients
Right arrow Inverse Procedures/Parameter Estimation
Right arrow Software
Right arrow Statistics

SHORT COMMUNICATIONS

Revisiting a Statistical Shortcoming when Fitting the Langmuir Model to Sorption Data

Carl H. Bolster*

U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, 230 Bennett Ln., Bowling Green, KY 42104

* Corresponding author (carl.bolster{at}ars.usda.gov).

Received for publication August 30, 2007. The Langmuir model is commonly used for describing the sorption behavior of reactive solutes to surfaces and is often fit to sorption data using nonlinear least squares regression. An important assumption of least squares regression is that the predictor variable is error free. In the case of sorption data, this assumption is not valid, and therefore the potential for parameter bias exists. Although alternative regression methods exist that either explicitly account for error in the predictor variable (Model II regression) or minimize the error in the predictor variable, these methods are not commonly used. Therefore, this paper more fully explores the differences in fitted parameters and model fits between these different data fitting methods by fitting P sorption data collected on 26 different soil samples using three different regression methods. For a majority of soils tested in this study, the differences in model fits between the three regression methods were not statistically significant. Statistical differences were observed in over a third of the soils, however, suggesting that errors in the predictor variable may be large enough to produce biased parameter estimates. These results suggest that multiple regression methods should be used when fitting the Langmuir model to sorption data to better assess the potential impact of error on model fits.

Abbreviations: NNLS, normal nonlinear least squares • SSE, sum of the squared errors • VNLS, vertical nonlinear least squares







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.