JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 8 August 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:1968-1973 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0594
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Boer, H. C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Boer, H. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by de Boer, H. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Animal Waste

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Waste Management

Co-digestion of Animal Slurry Can Increase Short-Term Nitrogen Recovery by Crops

H. C. de Boer*

Animal Production Div. of the Animal Sciences Group of Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 65, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands

* Corresponding author (Herman.deBoer{at}wur.nl).

Received for publication November 9, 2007. Co-digestion changes slurry characteristics and is supposed to increase short-term nitrogen (N) uptake by crops after application. A higher N uptake from slurry reduces the need for additional mineral N fertilizer. If farmers apply co-digested slurry (CS), a higher N recovery has to be taken into account to prevent losses to the environment. Since data on the effects of co-digestion on N recovery by crops are scarce, a pot experiment was performed. The apparent N recovery (ANR) of five different co-digested pig slurries was compared with their raw source slurries (RS) during 105 d after a single fertilization of ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), grown under controlled conditions. Slurry was mixed with sandy soil and grass was cut every 35 d. The results show that co-digestion increased (p < 0.05) the ANR at first cut on average from 39 to 50%, at second cut from 7 to 9% (p < 0.05), and had no effect on ANR at third cut (3%). The ANR increase at first cut was likely due to an increase of the NH4–N/total N ratio along with a decrease of the organic C/total N ratio of slurry during co-digestion. Field application may under certain circumstances decrease N fertilizer value of CS, due to a higher NH3 emission compared to RS. A potential ANR increase may then be reduced, absent, or even become a decrease. Under comparable NH3 emissions, however, CS can in the short term be more valuable as an N fertilizer than RS, and fertilizer savings can likely be realized.

Abbreviations: ANR, apparent nitrogen recovery • CS, co-digested slurry • LSD, least significant difference • REML, residual maximum likelihood • RS, undigested raw slurry • SED, standard error of deviation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.