JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 June 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:1634-1643 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0116
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nahlik, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mitsch, W. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nahlik, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mitsch, W. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nahlik, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mitsch, W. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Wetlands and Aquatic Processes
Right arrow Colloids

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Wetlands and Aquatic Processes

The Effect of River Pulsing on Sedimentation and Nutrients in Created Riparian Wetlands

Amanda M. Nahlik* and William J. Mitsch

Wilma H. Schiermeier Olentangy River Wetland Research Park, Environmental Science Graduate Program and School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State Univ., 352 W. Dodridge Street, Columbus, OH 43202

* Corresponding author (nahlik.1{at}osu.edu).

Received for publication March 5, 2007. Sedimentation under pulsed and steady-flow conditions was investigated in two created flow-through riparian wetlands in central Ohio over 2 yr. Hydrologic pulses of river water lasting for 6 to 8 d were imposed on each wetland from January through June during 2004. Mean inflow rates during pulses averaged 52 and 7 cm d–1 between pulses. In 2005, the wetlands received a steady-flow regime of 11 cm d–1 with no major hydrologic fluctuations. Thirty-two sediment traps were deployed and sampled once per month in April, May, June, and July for two consecutive years in each wetland. January through March were not sampled in either year due to frozen water surfaces in the wetlands. Gross sedimentation (sedimentation without normalizing for differences between years) was significantly greater in the pulsing study period (90 kg m–2) than in the steady-flow study period (64 kg m–2). When normalized for different hydrologic and total suspended solid inputs between years, sedimentation for April through July was not significantly different between pulsing and steady-flow study periods. Sedimentation for the 3 mo that received hydrologic pulses (April, May, and June) was significantly lower during pulsing months than in the corresponding steady-flow months. Large fractions of inorganic matter in collected sediments indicated that allochthonous inputs were the main contributor to sedimentation in these wetlands. Organic matter fractions of collected sediments were consistently greater in the steady-flow study period (1.8 g kg–1) than in the pulsed study period (1.5 g kg–1), consistent with greater primary productivity in the water column during steady-flow conditions.

Abbreviations: FPC, flood pulse concept • Is, sedimentation index • TSS, total suspended solids







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.