JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 June 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:1567-1574 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0338
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jaiswal, D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jaiswal, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jaiswal, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Municipal Waste
Right arrow Surface Water Quality
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Phosphorus

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Surface Water Quality

Managing Biosolids Runoff Phosphorus Using Buffer Strips Enhanced with Drinking Water Treatment Residuals

D. J. Wagner, H. A. Elliott*, R. C. Brandt and D. Jaiswal

Agricultural and Biological Engineering Dep., Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802

* Corresponding author (hae1{at}psu.edu).

Received for publication June 25, 2007. Vegetated buffers strips typically have limited ability to reduce delivery of dissolved phosphorus (DP) from agricultural fields to surface waters. A field study was conducted to evaluate the ability of buffer strips enhanced with drinking water treatment residuals (WTRs) to control runoff P losses from surface-applied biosolids characterized by high water-extractable P (4 g kg1). Simulated rainfall (62.4 mm h–1) was applied to grassed plots (3 m x 10.7 m including a 2.67 m downslope buffer) surface-amended with biosolids at 102 kg P ha–1 until 30 min of runoff was collected. With buffer strips top-dressed with WTR (20 Mg ha–1), runoff total P (TP = 2.5 mg L–1) and total DP (TDP = 1.9 mg L–1) were not statistically lower ({alpha} = 0.05) compared to plots with unamended grass buffers (TP = 2.7 mg L–1; TDP = 2.6 mg L–1). Although the applied WTR had excess capacity (Langmuir P maxima of 25 g P kg–1) to sorb all runoff P, kinetic experiments suggest that sheet flow travel time across the buffers (~30 s) was insufficient for significant P reduction. Effective interception of dissolved P in runoff water by WTR-enhanced buffer strips requires rapid P sorption kinetics and hydrologic flow behavior ensuring sufficient runoff residence time and WTR contact in the buffer. Substantial phosphate-adsorbent contact opportunity may be more easily achieved by incorporating WTRs into P-enriched soils or blending WTRs with applied P sources.

Abbreviations: BMP, best management practice • BPR, biological phosphorus removal • DP, dissolved phosphorus • PP, particulate phosphorus • PSC, phosphorus source coefficient • PSI, phosphorus saturation index • RDP, runoff dissolved phosphorus • TDP, total dissolved phosphorus • TP, total phosphorus • WEP, water-extractable phosphorus • WTR, water treatment residual







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.