JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 June 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:1536-1545 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0032
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schiavon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Malagoli, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schiavon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Malagoli, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schiavon, M.
Right arrow Articles by Malagoli, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sulfur
Right arrow Bioremediation and Biodegradation
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Plant and Environment Interactions

Interactions between Chromium and Sulfur Metabolism in Brassica juncea

Michela Schiavona, Elizabeth A.H. Pilon-Smitsb, Markus Wirtzc, Rüdiger Hellc and Mario Malagolia,*

a Dep. of Agricultural Biotechnology, Univ. of Padua, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro PD, Italy
b Biology Dep., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
c Inst. of Plant Sciences, Univ. of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

* Corresponding author (mario.malagoli{at}unipd.it).

Received for publication January 17, 2007. The effects of chromate on sulfate uptake and assimilation were investigated in the accumulator Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. Seven-day-old plants were grown for 2 d under the following combination of sulfate and chromate concentration: (i) no sulfate and no chromate (–S), (ii) no sulfate and 0.2 mmol L–1 chromate (–S +Cr), (iii) 1 mmol L–1 sulfate and no chromate (+S), or (iv) 1 mmol L–1 sulfate and 0.2 mmol L–1 chromate (+S +Cr). Despite the toxic effects exerted by chromate as indicated by altered level of reducing sugars and proteins in leaves, the growth of B. juncea was only weakly reduced by chromate, and no variation in chlorophyll a and b was measured, regardless of S availability. Chromium (Cr) was stored more in roots than in leaves, and the maximum Cr accumulation was measured in –S +Cr plants. The significant decrease of the sulfate uptake rates observed in Cr-treated plants was accompanied by a repression of the root low-affinity sulfate transporter (BjST1), suggesting that the transport of chromate in B. juncea may involve sulfate carriers. Once absorbed, chromate induced genes involved in sulfate assimilation (ATP-sulfurylase: atps6; APS-reductase: apsr2; Glutathione synthethase: gsh2) and accumulation of cysteine and glutathione, which may suggest that these reduced S compounds play a role in Cr tolerance. Together, our findings indicate that when phytoremediation technologies are used to recover Cr-contaminated areas, the concentration of sulfate in the plant growth medium must be considered because it may influence the ability of plants to accumulate and tolerate Cr.

Abbreviations: Cys, cysteine • GSH, glutathione • HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography • PC, phytochelatin • RT-PCR, reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.