JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 June 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:1432-1438 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0427
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jarecki, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jarecki, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jarecki, M. K.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Global Change
Right arrow Air Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Two Soils Receiving Nitrogen Fertilizer and Swine Manure Slurry

Marek K. Jareckia,*, Timothy B. Parkinb, Alvarus S. K. Chanc, Jerry L. Hatfieldb and Raymond Jonesd

a AgCert USA, National Soil Tilth Lab., 2110 University Ave., Ames, IA 50011
b National Soil Tilth Lab., 2110 University Ave., Ames, IA 50011
c AgCert USA, 1990 W. New Haven Ave., Suite 205, Melbourne, FL 32904
d AgCert Canada Co., 309 1st Street W., High River, AB T1V 1M5, Canada

* Corresponding author (marek.jarecki{at}ars.usda.gov).

Received for publication August 13, 2007. The interactive effects of soil texture and type of N fertility (i.e., manure vs. commercial N fertilizer) on N2O and CH4 emissions have not been well established. This study was conducted to assess the impact of soil type and N fertility on greenhouse gas fluxes (N2O, CH4, and CO2) from the soil surface. The soils used were a sandy loam (789 g kg–1 sand and 138 g kg–1 clay) and a clay soil (216 g kg–1 sand, and 415 g kg–1 clay). Chamber experiments were conducted using plastic buckets as the experimental units. The treatments applied to each soil type were: (i) control (no added N), (ii) urea-ammonium nitrate (UAN), and (iii) liquid swine manure slurry. Greenhouse gas fluxes were measured over 8 weeks. Within the UAN and swine manure treatments both N2O and CH4 emissions were greater in the sandy loam than in the clay soil. In the sandy loam soil N2O emissions were significantly different among all N treatments, but in the clay soil only the manure treatment had significantly higher N2O emissions. It is thought that the major differences between the two soils controlling both N2O and CH4 emissions were cation exchange capacity (CEC) and percent water-filled pore space (%WFPS). We speculate that the higher CEC in the clay soil reduced N availability through increased adsorption of NH4+ compared to the sandy loam soil. In addition the higher average %WFPS in the sandy loam may have favored higher denitrification and CH4 production than in the clay soil.

Abbreviations: CEC, cation exchange capacity • GHG, greenhouse gas • IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change • SOC, soil organic carbon • UAN, urea ammonium nitrate • %WFPS, percent water-filled pore space







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.