JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 June 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:1419-1431 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0358
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Landscape-Atmosphere Interactions
Right arrow Sulfur
Right arrow Nutrient Cycling
Right arrow Air Pollution
Right arrow Forest Soils

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Simulated Effects of Sulfur Deposition on Nutrient Cycling in Class I Wilderness Areas

Katherine J. Elliotta,*, James M. Vosea, Jennifer D. Knoeppa, Dale W. Johnsonb, Wayne T. Swanka and William Jacksonc

a Coweeta Hydrologic Lab., Southern Research Stn., USDA Forest Service, Otto, NC 28763
b Dep. of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Univ. of Nevada, Reno, NV 89512
c Air Resources Program, Region 8, USDA Forest Service, Asheville, NC 28804

* Corresponding author (kelliott{at}fs.fed.us).

Received for publication July 6, 2007. We predicted the effects of sulfate (SO4) deposition on wilderness areas designated as Class I air quality areas in western North Carolina using a nutrient cycling model (NuCM). We used three S deposition simulations: current, 50% decrease, and 100% increase. We measured vegetation, forest floor, and root biomass and collected soil, soil solution, and stream water samples for chemical analyses. We used the closest climate stations and atmospheric deposition stations to parameterize NuCM. The areas were: Joyce Kilmer (JK), Shining Rock (SR), and Linville Gorge (LG). They differ in soil acidity and nutrients, and soil solution and stream chemistry. Shining Rock and LG have lower soil solution base cation and higher acidic ion concentrations than JK. For SR and LG, the soil solution Ca/Al molar ratios are currently 0.3 in the rooting zone (A horizon), indicating Al toxicity. At SR, the simulated Ca/Al ratio increased to slightly above 1.5 after the 30-yr simulation regardless of S deposition reduction. At LG, Ca/Al ratios ranged from 1.6 to 2.4 toward the end of the simulation period, the 100% increase scenario had the lower value. Low Ca/Al ratios suggest that forests at SR and LG are significantly stressed under current conditions. Our results also suggest that SO4 retention is low, perhaps contributing to their high degree of acidification. Their soils are acidic, low in weatherable minerals, and even with large reductions in SO4 and associated acid deposition, it may take decades before these systems recover from depletion of exchangeable Ca, Mg, and K.

Abbreviations: NuCM, nutrient cycling model • JK, Joyce Kilmer/Slickrock wilderness • SR, Shining Rock wilderness • LG, Linville Gorge wilderness







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.