JEQ Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 23 June 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:1360-1367 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0283
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Venterea, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Stanenas, A. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Venterea, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Stanenas, A. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Venterea, R. T.
Right arrow Articles by Stanenas, A. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Tillage
Right arrow Landscape-Atmosphere Interactions
Right arrow Best Management Practices
Right arrow Nitrogen

Profile Analysis and Modeling of Reduced Tillage Effects on Soil Nitrous Oxide Flux

Rodney T. Venterea* and Adam J. Stanenas

USDA-ARS, Soil and Water Research Management Unit, 1991 Upper Buford Cir., 439 Borlaug Hall, St. Paul, MN 55108. Mention of product names is for the convenience of the reader and implies no endorsement on the part of the author or the USDA

* Corresponding author (rod.venterea{at}ars.usda.gov).

Received for publication June 1, 2007. The impact of no-till (NT) and other reduced tillage (RT) practices on soil to atmosphere fluxes of nitrous oxide (N2O) are difficult to predict, and there is limited information regarding strategies for minimizing fluxes from RT systems. We measured vertical distributions of key microbial, chemical, and physical properties in soils from a long-term tillage experiment and used these data as inputs to a process-based model that accounts for N2O production, consumption, and gaseous diffusion. The results demonstrate how differences among tillage systems in the stratification of microbial enzyme activity, chemical reactivity, and other properties can control N2O fluxes. Under nitrification-dominated conditions, simulated N2O emissions in the presence of nitrite (NO2) were 2 to 10 times higher in NT soil compared to soil under conventional tillage (CT). Under denitrification-dominated conditions in the presence of nitrate (NO3), higher bulk density and water content under NT promoted higher denitrification rates than CT. These effects were partially offset by higher soluble organic carbon and/or temperature and lower N2O reduction rates under CT. The NT/CT ratio of N2O fluxes increased as NO2 or NO3 was placed closer to the surface. The highest NT/CT ratios of N2O flux (>30:1) were predicted for near-surface NO3 placement, while NT/CT ratios < 1 were predicted for NO3 placement below 15 cm. These results suggest that N2O fluxes from RT systems can be minimized by subsurface fertilizer placement and by using a chemical form of fertilizer that does not promote substantial NO2 accumulation.

Abbreviations: CT, conventional tillage • DEA, denitrifier enzyme activity • GHG, greenhouse gas • NT, no till • RT, reduced tillage • SOC, soluble organic carbon • UAN, urea ammonium nitrate




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
R. T. Venterea and J. M. Baker
Effects of Soil Physical Nonuniformity on Chamber-Based Gas Flux Estimates
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 20, 2008; 72(5): 1410 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal Journal of Plant Registrations The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.