HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hartz, A. Articles by Rogerson, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hartz, A. Articles by Rogerson, A. Agricola Articles by Hartz, A. Articles by Rogerson, A. Related Collections Water Quality Laboratory Column Studies Runoff Other Environmental Contamination Water Pollution

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Surface Water Quality

Survival Potential of Escherichia coli and Enterococci in Subtropical Beach Sand: Implications for Water Quality Managers

^a Oceanographic Center of Nova Southeastern Univ., 8000 N. Ocean Dr., Dania Beach, FL 33004
^b Dep. of Infectious Diseases and Pathology, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
^c Dep. of Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic Univ., Davie, FL 33314
^d Coll. of Science and Mathematics, Fresno State Univ., Fresno, CA 93740
^e contributed equally to this work

^* Corresponding author (arogerson{at}csufresno.edu).

Received for publication June 14, 2007. Fecal bacteria have traditionally been used as indicator organisms to monitor the quality of recreational waters. Recent work has questioned the robustness of traditional indicators, particularly at seawater bathing beaches. For example, a study of Florida beaches found unexpectedly high abundances of Escherichia coli, fecal coliforms, and enterococci in beach sand. The aim of the present study was to explain these abundances by assessing the survival of E. coli and enterococci in beach sand relative to seawater. We used a combination of quantitative laboratory mesocosm experiments and field observations. Results suggested that E. coli and enteroccocci exhibited increased survivability and growth in sand relative to seawater. Because fecal bacteria are capable of replicating in sand, at least under controlled laboratory conditions, the results suggest that sand may be an important reservoir of metabolically active fecal organisms. Experiments with "natural" mesocosms (i.e., unsterilized sand or water rich in micropredators and native bacteria) failed to show the same increases in fecal indicators as was found in sterile sand. It is postulated that this was due to predation and competition with indigenous bacteria in these "natural" systems. Nonetheless, high populations of indicators were maintained and recovered from sand over the duration of the experiment as opposed to the die-off noted in water. Indicator bacteria may wash out of sand into shoreline waters during weather and tidal events, thereby decreasing the effectiveness of these indicators as predictors of health risk and complicating the interpretations for water quality managers.

Abbreviations: BHIB, brain-heart infusion broth • mEI agar, m-enterococcus agar plates with indoxyl-β-d-glucoside • PBS, phosphate-buffered saline • PSU, practical salinity units • USEPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Yamahara, S. P. Walters, and A. B. Boehm Growth of Enterococci in Unaltered, Unseeded Beach Sands Subjected to Tidal Wetting Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 15, 2009; 75(6): 1517 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]