JEQ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 May 2008
Published in J Environ Qual 37:808-816 (2008)
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2007.0011
© 2008 American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lowery, B.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lowery, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kang, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lowery, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Land-use Planning

TECHNICAL REPORTS

Landscape and Watershed Processes

Baseflow Nitrate in Relation to Stream Order and Agricultural Land Use

Shujiang Kanga, Henry Lina,*, William J. Gburekb, Gordon J. Folmarb and Birl Loweryc

a Dep. Crop and Soil Science, 116 ASI Building, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802
b Pasture System and Watershed Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Building 3702, University Park, PA 16802
c Dep. Soil Science, 1525 Observatory Dr, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706

* Corresponding author (henrylin{at}psu.edu).

Received for publication January 5, 2007. Management of agricultural nonpoint-source pollution continues to be a challenge because of spatial and temporal variability. Using stream order as an index, we explored the distribution of nitrate concentration and load along the stream network of a large agricultural watershed in Pennsylvania—the East Mahantango Creek Watershed and two of its sub-watersheds. To understand nitrate concentration variation in the stream water contributed from ground water, this study focused on baseflow. Impacts of agricultural land use area on baseflow nitrate in the stream network were investigated. Nitrate concentration showed a general decreasing trend with increasing stream order based on stream order averaged values; however, considerable spatial and temporal variability existed within each snapshot sampling. Nitrate loads increased with stream order in a power function because of the dominant effect of stream flow rate over the nitrate concentration. Within delineated sub-watersheds based on stream orders, positive linear functions were found between agricultural land use area percentage and the baseflow nitrate concentration and between agricultural drainage area and the nitrate load. The slope of the positive linear regression between the baseflow nitrate concentration and percent agricultural land area seems to be a valuable indicator of a watershed's water quality as influenced by agricultural practices, watershed size, and specific physiographic setting. Stream order seems to integrate, to a certain degree, the source and transport aspects of nonpoint-source pollution on a yearly averaged basis and thus might provide a quick estimate of the overall trend in baseflow nitrate concentration and load distribution along complex stream networks in agricultural watersheds.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America.